No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Primary clinical testing of the questionnaire “Brief questionary of quality of anxiety” in patients with generalized anxiety disorder
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2022
Abstract
The clinical differentiation of anxiety can play an important role, particularly in response to treatment. Patients with generalized anxiety disorders (GAD) reflect anxiety, therefore questionnaires are effective. Previous attempts to create a questionnaire assessing the quality of anxiety assessed only one aspect – tolerance to uncertainty (3). The new questionnaire covers such aspects of anxiety as behavioral manifestation, hypochondria, relation to cognition, personal trait and expectation from treatment.
Clinical testing of the questionnaire.
38 GAD patients (total score of Hamilton depression rating scale 27±4.7), aged 42.5±13, 75% females and 38 healthy volunteers aged 36.5±11, 74% females. The questionnaire included 8 statements, (two of them have subparagraphs). The testing version does not include statement about expectations from treatment. It takes 10 minutes to fill it out.
The difference between groups were found in following statements:
“I am often told that a am worried about small things” (χ2 22 p=0.00001)–behavioral presentation of anxiety.
“When I am anxious, I find it difficult to concentrate” (χ23,6 p=0.059)–cognitive aspect.
“My anxiety is getting worse, when I can’t complete the task strictly according to the instruction” (χ2 13.6 p=0.0002) -obsessive aspect.
“My anxiety is getting worse, when something goes wrong” (χ2=9 p=0.002)-obsessive aspect.
“My anxiety is getting worse, when I need to make my own decision” (χ29 p=0.003)- narcissism
“My anxiety is getting worse when I have to hold back irritation or discontent” (χ24.2 p=0.04)-narcissism.
Only part of statements differs GAD patients from healthy volunteers, but they cover different fields of mental functioning.
No significant relationships.
- Type
- Abstract
- Information
- European Psychiatry , Volume 65 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 30th European Congress of Psychiatry , June 2022 , pp. S390
- Creative Commons
- This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.