Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:35:47.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preventing human rights abuses in psychiatric establishments: the work of the CPT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

G. Niveau*
Affiliation:
Department of Community Health and Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, IUML-CMU, Avenue de Champel 9, 1211Geneva 4, Switzerland
*
[email protected] (G. Niveau).
Get access

Abstract

The mission of the European Committee for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (CPT) is to visit all places where people are detained and deprived of their liberty by a public authority, in States which are signatories to the Convention. Within this context, the CPT has visited many closed psychiatric establishments. We have studied reports, which were made public concerning 78 psychiatric establishments visited by the CPT between 1990 and 2001. No act considered to be torture was reported by the CPT, but several cases of deliberate ill-treatment of patients are described. Many serious cases of dysfunction concerning staff, treatment, the use of seclusion and restraint as well as lack of adequate safeguards, were also noted by the CPT. The recommendations, comments and requests for information issued by the CPT are intended to promote the reform of these establishments in order to promote human rights, in the States visited. These recommendations as well as the CPT’s annual reports, serve as reference standards for psychiatric practice, which respect human rights.

Type
Original article
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 European Psychiatric Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Council of Europe. European Convention for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment: historical background and main features of the Convention. Strasbourg 1989.Google Scholar
Harding, TW.Prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment: medical implications of a new European Convention. Lancet 1989;27:1191–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, OVHelweg-Larsen, KKelstrup, JCarle, PRehof, LA.The medical component in fact-finding missions. Dan Med Bull 1990;37:371–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Dougin, AM.Legal protection in psychiatry. The jurisprudence of the organs of the European Convention of Human Rights. Eur Psychiatry 1998;13:101s–6s.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, MDMorgan, R.Preventing torture. A study of the European Convention for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. European Convention for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment: http://www.cpt.coe.int.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. European Convention for the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Strasbourg 1998 Eighth general report on the CPT’s activities covering the period 1 January to 31 December 1997.Google Scholar
Harding, TW.Human rights law in the field of mental health: a critical review. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 2000;399:24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niveau, G.Traitement institutionnel des malades mentaux dangereux: un défi pour les Droits de l’Homme. J Méd Lég Droit Méd 2000;43:625–9.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. European Court of Human Rights. Case of Aerts vs. Belgium (61/1997/845/1051). Strasbourg 1998.Google Scholar
United Nations. Optional Protocol to the Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. third committee draft proposals, General Assembly, 57th Session, New York 2002.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.