Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:03:54.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presentation of a method of evaluating clinical criteria permitting recommendation of psychoanalytic treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

E Rappard ,
S Lancrenon ,
L Chaine  and
L Von Benedek
E Rappard
Affiliation:
Unité INSERM 302; Groupe de recherche sur les psychothérapies sous la direction du Professeur Widlöcher Groupe hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
S Lancrenon
Affiliation:
Unité INSERM 302; Groupe de recherche sur les psychothérapies sous la direction du Professeur Widlöcher Groupe hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
L Chaine
Affiliation:
Unité INSERM 302; Groupe de recherche sur les psychothérapies sous la direction du Professeur Widlöcher Groupe hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
L Von Benedek
Affiliation:
Unité INSERM 302; Groupe de recherche sur les psychothérapies sous la direction du Professeur Widlöcher Groupe hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
Get access

Summary

The method of evaluation we describe attempts to establish the criteria applied by clinicians when recommending psychoanalytical psychotherapy or psychoanalysis. A questionnaire was constructed and a study of inter-rater agreement using this research tool was carried out. The results of inter-rater agreement as well as the variations concerning each rater are discussed. Continuation of this study will provide the opportunity to examine the validity of general principles underlying the psychoanalysts’ perceptions of their patients.

Keywords

researchpsychoanalysisinter-rater agreement
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 9 , Issue 6 , 1994 , pp. 275 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work is the result of a research programme established in 1985 by a group directed by D Widlöcher. We particularly want to thank Dr A Braconnier, Mme L Von Benedek, Mme S Delattre, Mme O Dufloux, Mme V Abel Prot who actively participated in this research which is still going on today.

References

Benedek Von, ILe travail mental du psychanalyste Bégédis: Ed Universitaires, 1989Google Scholar
Cohen, JA coefficient of agreement for nominal scales Educ Psychol Measure 1960;20:213-20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fermanian, J Contribution à la méthodologie des essais thérapeutiques en psychiatric, étude des problèmes théoriques et pratiques posés par l'utilisation des échelles d'évaluation. Doctoral Thesis, faculté de médecine Pitié Salpêtrière, 1979Google Scholar
Fleiss, JLMeasuring nominal scale agreement among many raters Psychol Bull 1971;76:378-82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleiss, JLLarge simple variance of kappa in the case of different sets of raters Psychol Bull 1979:86:974-77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerin, PL'évaluation des psychothérapies Coll. Nodules, Paris: PUF, 1984Google Scholar
Gerin, PDazord, ARecherches cliniques “planifiées” sur les psychothérapies: Méthodologie INSFRM. Coll la Documentation francaise, Paris, 1992Google Scholar
Landis, RKoch, GA review of statistical methods in analysis of data araising from observers reliability studies Sta Neerland 1975;4:151-61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, JReflexions on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice In: J Psychoanal 1983:64:35Google Scholar
Schafer, RL'attitude analytique Paris: PUF, 1988Google Scholar
Tansey, MJBurke, WFUnderstanding Counter-transference from Projecting Identification lo Empathy Hillsdale, New Jersey: The Analytic Press, 1989Google Scholar
Widlöcher, DMétapsychologie du sens Paris: PUF, 1986Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.