Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:49:32.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preliminary data from a longitudinal 3-year study of patients with adjustment disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

B. Vallejo-Sánchez*
Affiliation:
Santa Bárbara Hospital, Mental Health Unit, Puertollano-Ciudad Real, Spain
J. Martinez Arnaiz
Affiliation:
Santa Barbara Hospital, Mental Health Unit, Puertollano-Ciudad Real, Spain
C. García Blanco
Affiliation:
Santa Barbara Hospital, Mental Health Unit, Puertollano-Ciudad Real, Spain
A.M. Pérez-García
Affiliation:
UNED, Psychology Faculty, Madrid, Spain
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Adjustment disorder (AD) is a common diagnosis, but there are relatively few studies, in part because the current definition is still poorly specified, inadequate and controversial. Some clinicians and researchers have pointed out that a psychiatric diagnosis should present a clinical description, as well as date based on psychological, biological and/or sociofamiliar studies, and follow-up investigation about outcome and prognosis, to increase the reliability and validity diagnosis and permits exclusion of other possible disorders and normality. There is much empirical evidence to indicate that AD is a transient disorder with a tendency to spontaneous remission. However, some studies have shown that patients with AD often develop major psychiatric disorders, presenting a higher rate of psychiatric morbidity, e.g., higher suicide rates.

Aim

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics, as well as some possible personal vulnerability factors in patients with AD.

Method

This longitudinal study was carried out on 80 outpatients diagnoses with AD at a Mental Health Unit, who were followed up for 3 years. It was analyzed different clinical and sociodemographic characteristics.

Results

Significant differences between groups were found in some of the variables considered.

Conclusions

The results add empirical evidence to a controversial and little-researched diagnostic category and provide guidelines for assessment and intervention. They also may contribute to improve diagnostic classifications.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV995
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.