Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:37:38.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perfectionism in eating disorders: Temperament or character? Does perfectionism improve on treatment outcome?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

T. Rodriguez Cano*
Affiliation:
Hospital General Ciudad Real, Psychiatry, Ciudad Real, Spain
L. Beato Fernandez
Affiliation:
Hospital General Ciudad Real, Psychiatry, Ciudad Real, Spain
B. Mata Saenz
Affiliation:
Hospital General Ciudad Real, Psychiatry, Ciudad Real, Spain
L. Rojo Moreno
Affiliation:
Universidad de Valencia, HUiP la Fe, Professor of Psychiatry, Valencia, Spain
F.J. Vaz Leal
Affiliation:
University of Extremadura Medical School Head, Mental Health and Eating Disorder Unit, University Hospital Network Badajoz, Professor of Psychiatry, Badajoz, Spain
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Perfectionism is considered a risk factor and is very close related to Eating Disorders (EDs). It estimates heritability of 29-42%. However, it has also been related to psychosocial factors such as the insecure attachment style.

Objectives

To study the relationship of perfectionism with personality dimensions, its likelihood of improvement and its treatment.

Aims

To analyze if Perfectionism is associated with dimensions of Temperament or dimensions of Character and therefore more psychosocial.

Methods

Participants were 151 female outpatients who consecutively started treatment at the Eating Disorders Unit (Ciudad Real University General Hospital). Personality was assessed by using the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI). Perfectionism was assessed by using the Edinburg Investigatory Test (EDI-2) subscale (t0). One year later, patients were re-assessed with the EDI-2 (t1).

Results

The scores on Perfectionism significantly improved from t0 to t1, (repeated measures ANOVA, F = 6.6, P < 0.01). At baseline, Perfectionism was related to any of the Temperament dimensions, but the Character variable Purposefulness (SD2) (β = .25 95% CI .17, 98), 2.7% of variance). Responsibility (SD1) and Self-Aceptance (SD4) were inversely associated with Perfectionism. At t1, Responsibility still was a protective factor for Perfectionism, regardless the effect of Perfectionism at t0.

Conclusions

Perfectionism is also related to psychosocial and developmental factors. People with an internal locus of control tend to take responsibility for their own actions and are resourceful in solving problems. Thus, Self-directedness, mainly Responsibility for their own actions, is a protective factor for Perfectionism in EDs.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EW216
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.