Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T06:50:00.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P-918 - Personality and Psychological Adjustment in Caregivers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

I. Cuellar-Flores
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain
M.P. Sanchez-Lopez
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
P. Santamaria
Affiliation:
Research & Development Department of TEA Ediciones, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Caring to a dependent person can suppose a risk for the caregiver's psychological health (Pinquart & Sorensen, 2003). This risk is clarified by the individual differences in personality (Hooker, Frazier y Monahan, 1994). They are stable although non-definitive personal characteristics, and their variability in efficiency depends on context (Millon, 1994). The processes involved in caregivers’ adaptation can facilitate or not a good general psychological adjustment (Limiñana, Corbalán & Calvo, 2009).

Objectives

To explore which caregiver's characteristics predict a better psychological adjustment.

Aims

To discriminate what characteristic of which is considered suitable to care of others contribute to caregiver's better functioning.

Methods

205 family and formal caregivers (mean age = 39.8; SD = 14.03; 83% formal caregivers) completed the Millon Index of Personality Styles (Millon, 1994), that assess normal personality and offers a Clinical Index, to evaluate psychological adjustment; and the CUIDA (Bermejo et al., 2008), a questionnaire of the adequate affective and cognitive variables to offer a good care of to others. Multiple linear stepwise regression was carried on.

Results

Caregiver characteristics related to Independence and Altruism explained worse psychological adjustment, whereas Self-steem, Sociability and Emotional balance explained better personal adjustment (R2 = .596; F = 7.466, p < .001).

Conclusions

Some personal characteristics that could be important for caregiving could not facilitate a good psychological adjustment in some caregiving contexts. Personal adaptation, as defined here, depends on context.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.