Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T06:51:59.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P-683 - Development and Validation of a Scale to Evaluate Treatment Progress in Secure Mental Health Settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

M. Baliousis
Affiliation:
School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Arnold Lodge Regional Secure Unit, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Leicester
N. Huband
Affiliation:
Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
C. Duggan
Affiliation:
Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
L. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Arnold Lodge Regional Secure Unit, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Leicester Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
B. Völlm
Affiliation:
School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Rampton Hospital, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Retford, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Forensic Mental Health provision in secure healthcare is complex. the availability of a short and quantifiable, yet comprehensive instrument for summarising patient progress encompassing multi-professional clinical input would facilitate clinical decision-making.

Objectives:

To develop and validate a Progress Rating Scale (PRS) for use in secure healthcare to assess patient course in treatment.

Aims:

PRS items will reflect multi-professional clinical input. Measurement will be valid and reliable.

Method:

Scale items

Development was undertaken at the Personality Disorder Service, Arnold Lodge Regional Secure Unit. Thematic analysis of 5 randomly selected archived treatment reviews resulted in a preliminary list of items. This scale was then piloted and refined via independent rating of further anonymised reports.

Validation and further development

To assess content validity, 3 independent raters applied the scale on archived treatment reviews of 12 randomly selected patients. Following examination of single-rating intra-class correlations (ICCs), items were revised to achieve greater content validity.

Results:

The domains of the scale were: Engagement, Behaviour, Mental State, Interactions with Peers and Staff, Insight, Supportive relationship, Employment, Leave, Violence/risk, Psychometric score and Final outcome (upon discharge). Initial inter-rater agreement ranged from fair to substantial (ICCs: 0.37–0.82). Following revisions, agreement improved ranging from moderate to substantial (ICCs: 0.63–0.92), the latter applying to most items.

Conclusions:

A scale for evaluating patient progress was developed based on multi-professional clinical input. the scale was refined to improve content validity. Internal consistency and factorial structure are under scrutiny and results will be available at the conference.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.