Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:51:43.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P-613 - Implementation Science: A new Paradigm in Organizing Mental Health Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

P. Mateus
Affiliation:
Ministry of Health of Portugal, Portugal
J. Caldas Almeida
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, UNL, Portugal
Á. Carvalho
Affiliation:
Ministry of Health of Portugal, Portugal
M. Xavier
Affiliation:
Ministry of Health of Portugal, Portugal Dept. Mental Health, Faculty of Medical Sciences, UNL, Lisbon, Portugal

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Implementation science evaluates the processes that move evidence-based treatments into routine use.

In Portugal, a new National Mental Health Plan with a community model has been launched in 2007. in order to change the operational model for mental health teams, a case-management (CM) training program has been prepared by the Ministry of Health.

Objectives:

To evaluate the effectiveness of the “implementation process” according to: a) profile of mental health services, b) organisational culture, c) barriers, d) degree of implementation.

Methods:

30 mental health services were assessed. the “implementation process” included a CM course (SAMHSA procedures). Implementation effectiveness and barriers were assessed by: Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument (MAJ Peters, 2001) and Illness Management Fidelity Scale - IMR (Mueser, 2009).

Results:

Assessment of services showed: liaison with primary health care (50%), routine use of guidelines (57%), single clinical records (50%), training and continuous education plan (85%), research practice (21%). Regarding the professionals, 70% reported previous case management practice, but only 20% had a formal training in CM. the CM approach was fully implemented in 36,3% of the services, fairly implemented in 45,4%, but still not enough implemented in 18,3%. Main barriers identified were related with availability of time (61%), lack of dedicated facilities (61%), low motivation (38%) and absence of financial incentives (38%).

Conclusions:

In Portugal several barriers still undermine the full implementation of CM. Implementation science may contribute to improve the delivery of evidence-based care.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.