Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:23:13.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P-175 - Concordance of Maintenance Treatment Patterns for Bipolar Disorders With Current Practice Guidelines in an Outpatient Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

L. Erkoreka
Affiliation:
CSM Ercilla, BOMS-Osakidetza, Bilbao, Spain
C. Bolado
Affiliation:
CSM Ercilla, BOMS-Osakidetza, Bilbao, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Wide variations in guideline concordance rates for bipolar disorder have been reported. To the authors' knowledge, no studies have been carried out in Spain.

Objective

To evaluate whether maintenance treatment patterns for outpatients with bipolar disorders in usual practice are concordant with evidence-based prescription guidelines.

Methods

Cross-sectional data are being collected, starting June 2011, from outpatients diagnosed of bipolar I or II disorders attended at a Mental Health Center in Bilbao (Spain). Information about their maintenance treatment is reviewed, and labelled as “concordant” or “non-concordant”. Medication considered concordant with current guidelines1,3 are lithium (serum levels 0,6–1,2 mEq/L obtained within the previous 6 months), valproate (serum levels 50–100 μg/mL within the previous 6 months), carbamazepine (serum levels 4–12 μg/mL within the previous 6 months), quetiapine (≥300 mg/d), olanzapine (≥10 mg/d), aripiprazole (≥15 mg/d) and, in bipolar II, lamotrigine ≥100 mg/d. Adjunctive use of other medications is also recorded. To assess concordance when various drugs are combined, at least one of them needs to be within therapeutic dose.

Results

Hitherto, data from 50 patients have been analyzed (66% females; mean age 52,82 ± 13,35; 68% bipolar I). 60% of them present a concordant treatment; 67,64% in the bipolar I subgroup and 43,75% in the bipolar II. Half of the patients are on antidepressants.

Conclusions

Despite the still small sample size and need of a multicenter assessment, adherence to guidelines seems suboptimal, mainly respecting bipolar II. Implementing interventions that have proven effective for enhancing evidence-based care and therefore improving outcomes should be considered.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.