Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T00:45:09.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P-1378 - Brain Stimulation Techniques: Non-invasive Treatments for Depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

E. Muñoz-Marron
Affiliation:
IN3, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
N. Robles
Affiliation:
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
L. Andreu-Barrachina
Affiliation:
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
M. Boixados-Angles
Affiliation:
IN3, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
D. Redolar-Ripoll
Affiliation:
IN3, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nowadays there is an increasing interest on brain stimulation techniques as therapeutic tools in psychiatric disorders. One of the most promising results has been obtained in depression treatment. In fact, some countries have approved the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as treatments for depression (European Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Unites States and Israel).

It is well known that both high frequency repetitive TMS (rTMS) and anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex (DLPF), are effective in decreasing depressive symptoms and they have lasting beneficial effects. First evidence of benefits of rTMS on depression was published by Pascual-Leone and co-workers in 1996 (Pascual-Leone et al., 1996). These results have been supported by others, both using rTMS (e.g. Anderson et al., 2009; George et al., 2010) and tDCS (e.g. Boggio et al., 2008; Rigonatti et al., 2008). On the other hand, later studies showed that low frequency rTMS over right PFDL cortex is also effective in depression improvement (Kauffmann, Cheema y Miller, 2004).

In addition, both techniques have reported good results as treatment of secondary depression associated with Parkinson, epilepsy and brain damage (Fregni et al., 2004; Fregni et al., 2005; Jorge et al., 2004).

Recent revisions and meta-analysis corroborates TMS and tDCS efficacy (e.g.: Slotema et al., 2010), always considering that their efficacy depends on several factors, such as the length of the current depression episode, age of patient, length of the treatment, stimulation intensity or number of pulses per session.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.