Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:37:42.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P03-373 - Relation Between Symptomatic and Functional Outcomes in Adults with ADHD Treated with OROS MPH - a Partial Correlation Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

J.K. Buitelaar
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, UMC St. Radbout, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
M. Roesler
Affiliation:
Institut für Gerichtliche Psychologie und Psychiatry, Universitätsklinikum Saarland, Homburg, Germany
S. Kooij
Affiliation:
Psycho Medical Centre, Parnassia, Den Haag, The Netherlands
M. Casas
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, C/Emanicipacio, Barcelona, Spain
J. Dejonckheere
Affiliation:
SGS Life Sciences Services, Antwerpen, Belgium
J. van Oene
Affiliation:
EMEA Medical Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Tilburg, The Netherlands
B. Schaeuble
Affiliation:
EMEA Medical Affairs, Janssen Cilag GmbH, Neuss, Germany
G.-E. Trott
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Universität Aschaffenburg, Aschaffenburg, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

To explore the relationship between symptomatic and functional outcomes in a five week, double blind, fixed dose, placebo controlled study in adults (age 18-65 years) with ADHD.

Methods

Post hoc-analysis of a five-week, double-blind (DB), parallel arm, placebo-controlled trial in adult subjects with ADHD (DSM-IV) and a Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS) score >= 24 at baseline. Subjects were randomized to OROS-MPH (18mg, 36mg, 72 mg/day) or placebo. Symptomatic outcomes were assessed by total CAARS score (TCS). Functional outcomes were assessed by Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total score and subscales (work, social life and family life), quality of life by Q-LES-Q total score. The relationship of CAARS with SDS and Q-LES-Q was assessed by Pearson's partial correlation analysis, with adjustment for baseline scores of CAARS, SDS, Q-LES-Q, CGI-S, age, sex, and randomization group.

Results

401 subjects were enrolled (54.4% male, mean (SD) age 34 (10.24) yrs). There was a significant treatment effect as measured in TCS at DB endpoint for all OROS MPH treatment groups compared to placebo (P< 0.05). The absolute value of partial correlations of symptomatic outcome with functional outcomes and quality of life varied between 0.54 and 0.36; all correlations were significant (p< 0.0001). These correlations were compared between the functional and quality of life measures, but none differed significantly.

Conclusion

Subjects’ symptomatic improvements during treatment with PR OROS MPH are reflected in improvements in their vocational and social function as measured by the SDS, and quality of life.

Type
Psychopharmacological treatment and biological therapies
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2010
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.