Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:32:37.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P0309 - Shared mental health care. One-year outcome for patients after a French consultation-liaison intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

N. Younes
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Psychiatry, Versailles Hospital, Le Chesnay Cedex, France U669, INSERM, Paris, National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM-U669), Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France University of Versailles, St Quentin En Yvelines, Paris, France
C. Passerieux
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Psychiatry, Versailles Hospital, Le Chesnay Cedex, France
N. Kayser
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Psychiatry, Versailles Hospital, Le Chesnay Cedex, France University of Versailles, St Quentin En Yvelines, Paris, France
M.C. Hardy-Bayle
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Psychiatry, Versailles Hospital, Le Chesnay Cedex, France University of Versailles, St Quentin En Yvelines, Paris, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Shared Mental Health care between Psychiatry and Primary care has been developed to improve the care of common mental health problems. Following a consultation-liaison intervention, this study evaluated one-year outcome for patients following the intervention to obtain objective data reflecting the “real-world” of shared mental health care.

Method:

95 patients from September 2006 to September 2007 (follow-up rate: 66%) were invited one year after the intervention to complete a paper questionnaire and a telephone short questionnaire about their mental health status, their care during the last year and their satisfaction with care.

Results:

89% of patients evaluated their current mental health as better then in the previous year. 44.5% were still managed by their GP as the psychiatric care provider (13.8% with a psychologist), 27.8% by a private psychiatrist, 11.1% by public psychiatry and 16.7% had no care anymore. 78.3% of patients evaluated the intervention as helpful for them.

Conclusions:

The intervention was helpful for primary care patients with common mental health problems, supporting primary care without GPs’ de-motivation or disqualification. This study conducted among patients confirmed a previous study conducted among GPs.

Type
Poster Session II: Epidemiology
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2008
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.