Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T04:25:02.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P0278 - Patient and physician satisfaction with risperidone long-acting injection: 18-month interim results from the electronic schizophrenia treatment adherence registry in Belgium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

J. Peuskens
Affiliation:
Universitair Psychiatrisch Centrum, KU Leuven Campus UC St.Jozef Kortenberg, Kortenberg, Belgium
M. Povey
Affiliation:
SGS Life Science Services, Wavre, Belgium
J. Van der Veken
Affiliation:
Janssen-Cilag, Berchem, Belgium
A. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Services, Beerse, Belgium
A. Lam
Affiliation:
Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Services, Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

To evaluate patient and physician satisfaction with risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) in patients with schizophrenia enrolled in the electronic Schizophrenia Treatment Adherence Registry (e-STAR) in Belgium.

Methods:

e-STAR is an ongoing, international, prospective, observational study of patients with schizophrenia who start RLAI during their routine clinical management. Treatment satisfaction was assessed by the patient and physician on a 5-point scale from ‘very good’ to ‘very bad’.

Results:

135 patients with mean age 40.9±14 years and duration of illness 9.5±9.2 years initiated treatment with RLAI, followed-up for at least 18 months were included in this analysis. At baseline, only 29.2% of patients expressed “good” or “very good” satisfaction while 21.1% of them expressed “bad” or “very bad” with their previous treatment. Similarly at baseline, 38.2% of physicians reported “good” or “very good” level of satisfaction and 14.6% rated their satisfaction as “bad” or “very bad” at that time. After initiation of RLAI, both patient and physician satisfaction with treatment improved dramatically. At 18 months, 76.5% of patients were satisfied (‘good’ or ‘very good’) with RLAI treatment and only 2.4% felt ‘bad’ and none reported ‘very bad’. Physicians also expressed satisfaction with RLAI with 82.1% of them rated it as ‘good’ or ‘very good’. Only one physician reported satisfaction below ‘moderate’.

Conclusions:

The low levels of patient and physician satisfaction with treatment prior to RLAI are likely to be a key decision driver to change therapy. After starting treatment with RLAI, both patient and physician satisfaction with the treatment substantially improved.

Type
Poster Session I: Neuroleptics and Antipsychotics
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2008
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.