The concept of “diagnosis” is discussed with regard to the fact that different scientific disciplines (i.e. chemistry, genetics, neurology, psychology, sociology, etc.) seem to lack a theoretical basic grid, enabling them to exchange and compare observations and interpretations of data. Various solutions have been offered to this problem: multidimensional diagnostic tools, and at present combining phrases (such as “neuro-psychological” or “psycho-social”) have become modern. Moreover, merely symptom-descriptive systems have evolved (such as the DSM system, ignoring causality). However, none of these solutions seem to resolve the problem of interdisciplinary exchange, but rather avoid it. The discussion explores this problem and suggests tentative interdisciplinary systemic assumptions, and a derived number of possible criteria for inter-disciplinary diagnostic practice.

(The discussion is based on the article “Current Problems in Diagnostic Theory and Practice – A Systemic Approach to Cross-Scientific Terms in the Diagnostic Babylon” by the speaker, published in Clinical Neuropsychiatry (2007), 4, 1, 23 -28) For copies please contact the author or Dr. Giovanni Fioriti, editore, Rome mail: [email protected])