No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2020
Evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram in outpatients with moderate to severe depression in naturalistic settings.
Open label 24 weeks study. Efficacy assessment was based on MADRS, HAM-D, HAM-A, CGI-S and VAS scales. Tolerability was evaluated by spontaneously reported adverse events and treatment discontinuation rates. Statistical analysis was based on an intent-to-treat dataset (ITT - at least one valid post-baseline MADRS measurement, prediction of previous visits using multiple linear regression) and observed cases (OC -MADRS measurements at all 6 visits).
A total of 112 patients between 18 and 65 years old were enrolled. 52 patients (46.4%) suffered from moderate depression (22£ MADRS<30) and 60 (53.6%) from severe depression(MADRS 330). Patients had a significant improvement in their symptoms at the end of the study, as measured by a mean change in MADRS total score of 21.2 ± 7.1 (ITT, multiple linear regression). Change from baseline was bigger in regards to severity of illness (p<0.001). In addition, 89.1% of patients were evaluated as responders (at least 50% decrease in MADRS total score) and 68.2% were evaluated as remitters (MADRS£12) at the end of the study (ITT, multiple linear regression). The results were similar in the OC analysis as well. In total 33 patients (29.5%) withdrew from the study for any reason, -6 of them (5.4%) due to adverse events and 1 (0.9) due to lack of efficacy.
Escitalopram displayed very good efficacy and tolerability in a group of depressed outpatients suffering from moderate to severe illness.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.