Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:46:42.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Online T group experiences during COVID-19 pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

G. Arbanas
Affiliation:
1department of forensics, University Psychiatric Hospital Vrapče, Zagreb
A. Botica*
Affiliation:
2Department of psychiatry, University Hospital of Split, Split
H. Goršić
Affiliation:
3University Psychiatric Hospital “Sveti Ivan”, Zagreb
M. Baković
Affiliation:
4Ugljan, Psychiatryc Hospital, Zadar
M. Bagarić
Affiliation:
5University Psychiatric Hospital Vrapče, Zagreb, Croatia
I. Barun
Affiliation:
3University Psychiatric Hospital “Sveti Ivan”, Zagreb
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Online group therapy has become more popular in the past few years. But as a result of the COVID-19-caused pandemic, it developed suddenly. Due to the conventional face-to-face format no longer being possible and the need for psychotherapists to conduct psychotherapy online, the pandemic has had significant effects on group psychotherapy and the interactions between group therapy members. While therapists are becoming accustomed to the modern form of psychotherapy, its efficacy is being questioned due to technical issues, the problem of the therapeutic alliance, the environment, the ability to read nonverbal signals, breaking group norms, etc. Since the pandemic did not abate, as a part of specialist education training groups were also held online.

Objectives

The pandemic changed the basic settings of our Group-Analytic Training Group, forcing us to switch to online sessions. This study aimed to find personal experiences that varied throughout online and face-to-face meetings.

Methods

Seven out of the twelve participants accepted to take part in the group therapy/training after it was recommended by the group leader that they write a paper. After 30 sessions, the group turned from face-to-face to online group therapy, and the members were asked how they felt about the difference between the two types of therapy. A questionnaire was produced by the group’s leader and a number of other participants, who then forwarded it through email to every group member.

Results

Everyone who participated thought that because one can more quickly pick up on non-verbal signs in a face-to-face scenario, it was simpler to notice feedback from the other group members. Most participant comments focused on the leader’s role. The majority of members claimed that taking part in the experiential group had benefited both their personal and professional lives.However they thought the in-person setting was better since it was more interesting and complex.

Conclusions

Since there were no other options during the epidemic, group therapy has moved to virtual environments, although there are still a lot of problems to this method. The formation of group cohesion becomes difficult by the absence of group members’ physical presence and by the inability to completely understand nonverbal communication.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.