Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:29:57.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the conceptualisation of subaffective personality disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Get access

Summary

The reconceptualisation of German traditional constructs of subaffective personality disorders (PDs) was stimulated by clinical and some empirical evidence of mild and enduring alterations of mood and drive in patients who never developed one of the full-blown mood disorders. The aim of the study was to clarify the status of historical concepts of subaffective PDs (as there are the depressive, hyperthymic, cyclothymic, and asthenic type) in relation to the modern Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-III-R conceptions of personality disorders and the five factor theory of personality. A consecutive psychiatric sample and a normal control sample were used to investigate these relationships. By means of a non-metric multi-dimensional scaling procedure, and facet theoretical interpretation, the depressive and asthenic PDs were demonstrated to correspond highly with the global construct of PD as well as with the personality factor neuroticism which proved to be elevated in most types of PDs within the clinical sample. The hyperthymic and cyclothymic categories displayed differences to most DSM-III-R constructs of PD in the clinical but not in the control sample. The findings may explain the chronic course of some depressive or somatization disorders that are difficult to influence by pharmacotherapy and that may require special treatment strategies.

Type
Original article
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akiskal, HSAn integrative perspective on recurrent mood disorders: the mediating role of personalityBecker, J, Kleinman, APsychosocial aspects of depression Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991 215235Google Scholar
Akiskal, HS, Akiskal, KCyclothymic, hyperthymic, and depressive temperaments as subaffective variants of mood disordersTasman, A, Riba, MBAmerican Psychiatric Press Review of Psychiatry Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1992 4362Google Scholar
Borg, I. Facetten- und Radextheorie in der multidimensionalen Skalierung Facet- and radex theory in multidimensional scaling Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 1976; 7: 231247Google Scholar
Borg, IBasis and results of facet theoryGrundlagen und Ergebnisse der Facettentheorie Bern: Huber, 1992Google Scholar
Borkenau, P, Ostendorf, FNEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEOFFI) nach Costa & McCrae. Handanweisung. [NEO-Five-Factors Inventory] Göttingen: Hogrefe, 1993Google Scholar
Bronisch, T, Mombour, W. Comparison of a diagnostic checklist with a structured interview for the assessment of DSM-III-R and ICD-10 Personality disorders Psychopalhology 27 6 1994 312320CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canter, DFacet theory, approaches to social research New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Tokyo: Springer, 1985Google Scholar
Costa, PT, McCrae, RR. The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders J Pers Disord 6 4 1992 343359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, HJ, Eysenck, SBGPersonality and individual differences. A natural science approach New York: Plenum Press, 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, PPersonality disorders Persönlichkeitsstörungen Weinheim: Beltz, 1994Google Scholar
Golomb, M, Fava, M, Abraham, M, Rosenbaum, JF. Gender differences in personality disorders Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152: 579582Google ScholarPubMed
Guttman, L. A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest co-ordinate space for a configuration of points Psychometrica 1968; 33: 469506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. What is not what in statistics Statistician 1977; 26: 81107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herpertz, S, Steinmeyer, EM, Saß, H. Patterns of “comorbidity” among DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorders as observed with a new inventory for the assessment of personality disorders Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 24431994 161169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, DN. Depressive personality: reliability, validity, and relation to dysthymia J Abnorm Psychol 99 4 1990 412421CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, DN, Miller, GA. Depressive personality in nonclinical subjects Am J Psychiatry 1993; 150: 17181724Google ScholarPubMed
Kraepelin, EPsychiatry: a textbook5th edPsychiatric Ein Lehrbuch für Studierende und Ärzte Leipzig: Barth, 1896Google Scholar
Kraepelin, EPsychiatry: a textbook 2 bd 7th ed Psychiatrie, Ein Lehrbuch für Studierende und Ärzte Leipzig: Barth, 1904Google Scholar
Kraepelin, EPsychiatry: a textbook 3 bd 8th ed Psychiatrie, Ein Lehrbuch für Studierende und Ärzte Leipzig: Barth, 1913Google Scholar
Krauth, J. A modification of kappa for interobserver bias Biometric J 1984; 26: 435445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretschmer, EKörperbau und Character [Body and character] Berlin: Springer, 1921Google Scholar
Levy, S, Guttman, LA faceted cross-cultural analysis of some core social valuesCanter, DFacet theory. Approaches to social research New York: Springer, 1985 205222Google Scholar
Lingoes, JCThe Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric program series Ann Arbor: Mathesis Press, 1973Google Scholar
Lingoes, JC, Guttman, LGeometric representation of relational data. With social sciences application Ann Arbor: Mathesis Press, 1979Google Scholar
Phillips, KA, Gunderson, JG, Hirschfeld, R, Smith, LE. A review of the depressive personality Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147: 830837Google ScholarPubMed
Saß, H, Mende, MZur Erfassung von Persönlichkeitsstörungen mit einer integrierten Merkmalsliste gem. DSM-UI-R und ICD-10 bei stationär behandelten psychiatrischen Patienten Assessment of personality disorders with an integrated inventory according to DSM-III-R and ICD-10 within a population of psychiatric inpatientsBaumann, K, Fähndrich, E, Stieglitz, RD, Woggon, BVeränderungsmessung in Psychiatrie und Klinischer Psychologie Munich: Profit-Verlag, 1990 195206Google Scholar
Saß, H, Steinmeyer, EM, Ebel, H, Herpertz, S.. Untersuchungen zur Kategorisierung und Dimensionierung von Persönlichkeitstörungen Studies on categorical and dimensional concepts of personality disorders Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie 2431995 239251Google Scholar
Schneider, K. The psychopathic personalities Die psychopathischen Persönlichkeiten Leipzig: Thieme, 1923Google Scholar
Shouten, HJA. Measuring pairwise agreement among many observers II Biometric J 1980; 22: 49750410.1002/bimj.4710220605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shouten, HJA. Measuring pairwise agreement among many observers II. Some improvements and additions Biometric J 1982; 24: 431435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shye, STheory construction and data analysis in the behavioral sciences San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1978Google Scholar
Steinmeyer, EM, Herpertz, S, Saß, H. Facettentheoretische Konstruktvalidierung. [Facet theoretical validation of construct.] In: Möller, HJ, Engel, R, Hoff, P, eds. Befunderhebung in der Psychiatrie Wien, New York: Springer-Verlag (in press)Google Scholar
von Zerssen, D. Persönlichkeitszüge als Vulnerabilitätsindikatoren Probleme ihrer Erfassung. [Personality traits as indicators of vulnerability — problems of assessment.] Fortschritte Neurologie Psychiatrie 1994; 62: 113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D, Clark, LA, Harkness, AR. Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology J Abnorm Psychol 10311994 1831CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Widiger, TA, Costa, PT. Personality and personality disorders J Abnorm Psychol 10311994 7891CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.