Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:34:40.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Olfactory Reference Syndrome: Case Presentation and Review of Treatment Options

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

R. Pezoa Jares
Affiliation:
Clinical Division, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Unit – Nuevo Leon Ministry of Health, Monterrey, Mexico
J. Garza Garza
Affiliation:
Clinical Division, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Unit – Nuevo Leon Ministry of Health, Monterrey, Mexico
Y. Martínez Garabán
Affiliation:
Clinical Division, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Unit – Nuevo Leon Ministry of Health, Monterrey, Mexico
S. Lozano González
Affiliation:
Clinical Division, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Unit – Nuevo Leon Ministry of Health, Monterrey, Mexico

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

First described as a case series by Pryse-Phillips in 1971, Olfactory Reference Syndrome (ORS) has been increasingly reported in the scientific literature. Although current classifications do not consider ORS as a unique clinical entity, its existence is widely acknowledged. Different approaches to treatment have been described.

Objectives

1) Portray the clinical features and treatment response of a patient with ORS. 2) Summarize knowledge on different treatment options for ORS.

Aims

We present the case of a teenager with major depressive disorder who developed the delusional belief of emitting a foul smell (without any other psychotic symptoms), and report his response to antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Subsequently, we embark on a literature review on pharmacological and non-pharmacological options for patients with ORS.

Methods

We conducted a literature review in different databases using the keyword 'olfactory reference syndrome'. Papers published from 1971 to 2014 were selected on the basis of availability, relevant information in the title/abstract, and language (English, Spanish or Portuguese).

Results

A brief summary is presented on the treatment options found in selected papers.

Conclusions

Different treatment approaches have proven beneficial for patients with ORS. This may reflect, however, a diversity of mechanisms by which this ailment is generated. More research on the physiopathology of ORS might result in better treatment outcomes.

Type
Article: 1577
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.