Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:47:55.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Objective versus subjective sleep in patients with insomnia related to generalized anxiety disorder and apnea as compared with normals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

B. Saletu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria Institute of Sleep Medicine, Rudolfinerhaus, Austria
P. Anderer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria The Siesta Group Schlafanalyse GmbH, Austria
G. Gruber
Affiliation:
The Siesta Group Schlafanalyse GmbH, Austria
S. Parapatics
Affiliation:
The Siesta Group Schlafanalyse GmbH, Austria
G. Dorffner
Affiliation:
The Siesta Group Schlafanalyse GmbH, Austria Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
G.M. Saletu-Zyhlarz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Earlier studies reported that subjective sleep quality correlates with objective polysomnographically measured sleep initiation and continuity, but less with sleep architecture.

Aims

This study aimed to investigate relations between subjective and objective sleep in normals (N), insomnia comorbid with generalized anxiety disorder (G) and apnea (A).

Methods

One hundred and seventy-seven normals (50.9±19.6a), 100 insomniac G patients (37.9±10.6a) and 51 A patients (51.3±9.7a) completed the self-rating scale for sleep and awakening quality (Saletu et al. 1997) regarding two polysomnographic nights analyzed by the Somnolyzer (Anderer et al. 2005). Correlations were calculated based on changes between the first (adaptation) and second polysomnographic night to diminish inter-individual variances of sleep perception.

Results

In N, subjective sleep quality (S-QUA) demonstrated correlations (p < 0.01) with sleep efficiency (EFF), wake after sleep onset (WASO), S2, S1%, REM, S1, frequency of awakenings (FW), latency to continuous sleep (L-CONT), sleep latency (S-LAT) and slow-wave sleep, while awakening quality (A-QUA) showed weak (p < 0.05) correlations with EFF and WASO. Somatic complaints (S-COM) correlated (p < 0.05) with WASO and REM. In G, correlations (p < 0.01) were obtained between S-QUA and EFF, WASO, S2, L-CONT and S-LAT (p < 0.05), while A-QUA correlated with S2, WASO and EFF. In A, S-QUA correlated (p < 0.01) with EFF, S2, S1%, S2%, L-CONT, WASO and less (p < 0.05) with S-LAT and S1. A-QUA correlated with S2, S2% (p < 0.01), L-CONT and EFF (p < 0.05). S-COM correlated with S-CONT (p < 0.01) and S-LAT (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

EFF, WASO, S2 and less S-LAT determine good S-QUA in all groups.

Type
S46-02
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.