Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:40:57.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonspecific treatment response in alcoholics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

J.K. Penberthy*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Nonspecific treatment response is common in pharmacotherapy trials for alcohol dependence, and results in a marked decrease in alcohol consumption even before subjects' enrollment in a treatment study. We propose that nonspecific effects are associated with trait and state factors operating prior to treatment to influence participants' expectation/perception of future treatment outcome and their drinking behavior. Trait factors include personality, and state factors include readiness to change and severity of drinking at screening. Our study goal was to determine how these nonspecific effects contribute to pre-double-blind clinical outcome.

Methods:

We examined the association of trait factors (gregariousness or conformity on MacAndrew Alcoholism Scale (MAS)) and state factors (stages-of-change scale, level of drinking at screening) with pre-double-blind clinical outcome among 321 alcoholics in a pharmacotherapy trial.

Results:

Nonspecific effects were associated with significant reduction in alcohol consumption among heavy drinkers (10.3±5.9 drinks/day at baseline vs 5.3±5.1 drinks/day during the last week of single-blind treatment; p<0.001) but not non-heavy drinkers (3.07±0.65 vs 2.98±2.6; p>0.05). Partial correlations indicate that significant predictors of pre-double-blind drinking reductions were: level of drinking (–0.215) and the stages-of-change subscales of pre-contemplation (–0.152), contemplation (0.144), and the struggle to maintain (–0.284). The MAS did not predict pre-double-blind drinking reductions.

Conclusions:

Participants with higher motivation levels and greater drinking severity were most likely to experience nonspecific treatment effects before double-blind treatment. Gregariousness and conformity were not associated with nonspecific treatment effects.

Type
Poster Session 1: Alcoholism and Other Addictions
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2007
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.