Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:29:20.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-participation to a longitudinal and interventional survey on the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare workers (PSYCOVER) in France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

C. Vuillermoz*
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, Iplesp, Social Epidemiology Research Team, Paris, France
L. Fossi
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, Iplesp, Social Epidemiology Research Team, Paris, France
T. El Aarbaoui
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, Iplesp, Social Epidemiology Research Team, Paris, France
A. Gosselin
Affiliation:
Ined, Unité Mortalité Santé Epidémiologie, Aubervilliers, France
N. Vignier
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, Iplesp, Social Epidemiology Research Team, Paris, France
M. Melchior
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, Iplesp, Social Epidemiology Research Team, Paris, France
S. Vandentorren
Affiliation:
Santé publique France, Direction Scientifique Et Internationale, Saint Maurice, France
L. Bertuzzi
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis D’épidémiologie Et De Santé Publique, Iplesp, Social Epidemiology Research Team, Paris, France
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

We conducted a national longitudinal survey among healthcare workers in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, (1) to assess mental health and (2) to describe the results of an intervention to improve capacity of resilience. Non-participation is rarely studied despite being an important methodological matter when performing studies on mental health.

Objectives

The study aims to describe and identify the factors associated with non-participation of healthcare workers to the intervention part of a national longitudinal study on the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Participants were recruited from April to October 2021 via an Internet link widely disseminated. Data collected include participant’ socio-demographic, occupational and working conditions, general health, professional burnout and mental health. The intervention proposed the use of tools for self-management of stress and resilience (PsySTART-Responder® and Anticipate.Plan.Deter™ program). A robust Poisson regression was used to identify factors associated with non-participation.

Results

Among 724 participants, 41% participated to the intervention part. Factors associated to non-participation to the intervention were to work with few or no COVID-19 patients, and low scores in the anxiety scale. Social determinants, occupational characteristics or general health were not associated with non-participation.

Conclusions

Our study provides a better understanding of the participation of healthcare workers that was not frequently studied. The results logically suggest lower participation among those with better mental health and not directly concerned with management of COVID-19 patients. Non-participation to the intervention was not associated with social factors, which is an argument in favour of using such a design/intervention in a socially heterogeneous population.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.