Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:41:33.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mental health needs of heart and lung transplant recipients in Ireland using the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) tool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

K. Corrigan*
Affiliation:
Liaison Psychiatry, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
G. Crudden
Affiliation:
Liaison Psychiatry, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
B. Mohammed
Affiliation:
Liaison Psychiatry, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital
R. Duffy
Affiliation:
Perinatal Psychiatry, Rotunda Hospital
A. Doherty
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, University College Dublin
Z. Azvee
Affiliation:
Adult Psychiatry, St Vincent’s Hospital Fairview
A. Clarke
Affiliation:
Liaison Psychiatry, The Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

International guidelines recommend that prospective organ transplant patients receive a psychosocial assessment to optimise outcomes. There is limited consensus regarding the criteria for psychosocial evaluation. The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) tool was developed to enhance the pre-transplant psychosocial workup. The Mater Hospital is the National Centre for heart and lung transplantation in Ireland. The consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLP) service provides screening of pre-transplant candidates using a biopsychosocial assessment, SIPAT and cognitive screening tools. Post-transplant patients are reviewed on a referral basis.

Objectives

To identify the psychosocial needs of heart and lung transplant recipients and CLP service input over a one year period.

Methods

A review of all heart and lung transplant recipients between January 1st and December 31st 2021 was conducted. The following data were recorded: demographics, pre-existing mental illness, SIPAT scores, and referral to the CLP service within six months of transplantation.

Results

Twenty-eight individuals received a heart/lung transplant in 2021 (7 heart, 19 lung, 1 heart &liver, 1 heart & lung). Prior to transplant 50% (14/28) had a pre-existing mental health diagnosis, 7% (2/28) had attended a psychiatrist, and 28.6% (8/28) were on psychotropic medication. SIPAT scores were available for 20 patients. The overall mean SIPAT score was 10.8 (SD 6.1). The subscales were as follows: Patient Readiness, mean 3.2 (SD 1.7); Social Support System, mean 2.1 (SD: 1.8); Psychological Stability & Psychopathology, mean 1.6 (SD 2.7); and Lifestyle & Substance Misuse, mean 3 (SD 1.5). Based on SIPAT scores, 20% (4/20) were excellent candidates, 75% (15/20) were good candidates and 1 (1/20) was minimally acceptable. Pre-existing mental illness was associated with higher total SIPAT scores (p=0.013) and higher scores on the psychological stability subscale (p=0.032). Post-transplant, 50% (14/28) were referred for psychological support and 21.4% (6/28) were referred to the CLP service. A further 10.7% (n=3) were attending CLP prior to transplant. Referrals to CLP occurred (median) 13 days (range 1-275) post-transplant surgery. The reasons for attending CLP were anxiety (5/9), delirium (3/9) and mood (1/9).

Conclusions

SIPAT can be a valuable tool for use in the pre-transplant workup to help identify those that will require intensive psychosocial support post- transplant.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.