Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:14:13.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Light as an Aid for Recovery in Psychiatric Inpatients: A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Pilot Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

N. Okkels
Affiliation:
Aarhus University Hospital Risskov, Clinic for OCD and Anxiety, Risskov, Denmark
L.G. Jensen
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Department of Mathematics, Aarhus, Denmark
R. Arendt
Affiliation:
Aarhus University Hospital Risskov, Department of Affective Disorders, Risskov, Denmark
A.B. Blicker
Affiliation:
Aarhus University Hospital Risskov, Department of Affective Disorders, Risskov, Denmark
J. Hjortdal
Affiliation:
Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus, Denmark
P. Jennum
Affiliation:
Copenhagen University Hospital, Danish Center for Sleep Medicine, Copenhagen, Denmark
S. Straszek
Affiliation:
Aarhus University Hospital Risskov, Department of Affective Disorders, Risskov, Denmark

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Electric indoor lighting can disturb sleep and increase depressive symptoms; both common complaints in psychiatric inpatients.

Aims

To improve quality of sleep in patients using an indoor hospital lighting environment simulating nature in intensity, color, and circadian timing.

Methods

Investigator-blinded parallel group randomized controlled effectiveness trial supplied with qualitative interviews in an inpatient psychiatric ward with fully automatic and adjustable lighting. Admitted patients received a room with a naturalistic lighting environment (intervention group) or lighting as usual (control group). The primary outcome was the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index and secondary outcomes included the Major Depression Inventory and WHO-five Well- Being Index.

Results

In this ongoing trial, we included 28 patients (16 treated and 12 controls). Patients in the intervention group reported higher subjective sleep quality and sleep efficiency, lower use of sleep medication (mean difference, 4.68 mg; 95% CI, 0.54; 53.5), fewer depressive symptoms (mean difference, 5; 95% CI,–2; 13), but lower well-being (difference,–4 percentage points; 95% CI,–20; 16), compared with the control group. At discharge, fewer patients in the intervention group had experienced use of involuntary treatment. Qualitative data indicated no side effects apart from issues in performing indoor leisure activities in dim light.

Conclusions

A naturalistic lighting environment was safe and improved sleep and mood in our small patient sample. The trial integrated well with routine clinical care and our sample reflected the heterogeneity of the target population (Funded by Region Midtjylland and others; Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT02653040)

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
e-Poster Walk: Sexual medicine and mental health/sleep disorders and stress/eating disorders
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.