Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:39:10.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Legislation and practice in the management of violent patients in Europe. A case vignette study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

T. Steinert
Affiliation:
Centre for Psychiatry Weissenau, University of Ulm, Ravensburg-Weissenau, Germany
P. Lepping
Affiliation:
Llwyn-y-Groes Psychiatric Unit, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background and Aims

Patients who exhibit violent behaviour or refuse medication during in-patient treatment are a challenge for clinical management. The management of those clinical situations is different in European countries with respect to legislation and clinical routine.

Methods

We selected three case vignettes which were considered as most typical and relevant by a vote among members of the European Violence in Psychiatry Research Group (EViPRG). Case 1 represents a voluntary in-patient who assaults a staff member, case 2 an involuntary patient who does not behave violently but refuses medication, and case 3 an out-patient who is violent against family members. In all three case vignettes the respective patients were presented as suffering from schizophrenia. From 12 European countries, each two experts were interviewed by a questionnaire about the typical clinical management and its legal requirements in these cases. Consensus among the country experts was reached after further discussion, if necessary.

Results

Considerable differences were found with respect to involvement of jurisdiction and police, application of involuntary medication, requirements for a transfer to forensic psychiatry, and use of coercive measures. Physical restraint, seclusion, and mechanical restraint each are common in some countries and forbidden or definitely not used in others.

Conclusions

More evidence from sound studies is required regarding safety, outcomes and ethical aspects of coercive treatment.

Type
S27. Symposium: Coercive Interventions for Disturbed Inpatient Behaviour and Alternatives
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2007
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.