Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T10:35:29.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How do emotion regulation strategies influence the way personality affects obsessive-compulsive symptoms?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

M. B. Couto ,
I. Araújo ,
M. Picó-Pérez  and
P. Morgado
M. B. Couto*
Affiliation:
1Clinical Academic Center - Braga, Braga, Portugal 2Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), University of Minho, Braga, Portugal 3ICVS/3B’s, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal, Braga 4Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira Guimarães, Guimarães
I. Araújo
Affiliation:
5Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
M. Picó-Pérez
Affiliation:
5Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
P. Morgado
Affiliation:
5Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a chronic disabling condition, with considerable lifetime prevalence. There are interindividual differences regarding personality dimensions and how they affect obsessive- compulsive (OC) symptomatology. Furthermore, there is a connection between OC symptoms and the use of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies (expressive suppression) instead of using more cognitive reappraisal.

Objectives

Explore the relationship between personality, emotion regulation strategies and OC symptoms by testing a path analytic model in a sample of healthy participants and in a sample of OCD patients.

Methods

Two samples of participants were utilized. Sample 1 consists of 787 healthy participants from the general Portuguese population. Sample 2 is composed of 33 OCD patients and 32 Healthy Controls (HC). Participants completed different scales: Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R), through online surveys (sample 1) or a clinical interview (sample 2). These questionnaires were then analyzed with a path-analytic approach.

Results

In sample 2, we found significant differences between OCD patients and HC in every OCI-R subscale, except Hoarding and Neutralizing. In the NEO-FFI, OCD patients scored higher on Neuroticism and lower on Extraversion. No significant differences were found regarding the ERQ. Relatively to sample 1: path analysis results showed that 13,4% of the variance of OC symptoms was explained by the best-fitting model. Only Neuroticism and Extraversion were directly associated with higher OCI-R Total scores, whereas Agreeableness predicted less OC symptoms. The use of Expressive Suppression was associated with more OC symptomology, but no significant connection was found with Cognitive Reappraisal. Regarding sample 2, no model was found, showing no modifying effect of emotion regulation strategies on OC Symptoms.

Conclusions

There is a deep-rooted interconnection between personality and emotion regulation regarding OC symptomatology in a sample of healthy participants but no effect of emotion regulation was seen regarding OCD patients.

To sum up, promising results were obtained and it could be an important field for the OCD in terms of diagnostic, severity and treatment.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 66 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 31st European Congress of Psychiatry , March 2023 , pp. S228 - S229
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.