Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:20:05.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender-gaps and glass ceilings: A survey of gender-specific publication trends in Psychiatry between 1994 and 2014

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

S. Süßenbacher ,
M. Amering ,
A. Gmeiner  and
B. Schrank
S. Süßenbacher*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Division for Social Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, Austria
M. Amering
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Division for Social Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, Austria
A. Gmeiner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Division for Social Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, Austria
B. Schrank
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Landesklinikum Tulln, Alter Ziegelweg 10, Tulln, Austria
*
* Corresponding author. E-mail address:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Background:

Within academic psychiatry, women are underrepresented in the higher academic ranks. However, basic determinants of women's lack of academic advancement such as publication activity are poorly understood. The present study examines women's publication activity in high-impact psychiatry journals over two decades and reports developments in the numbers of male and female authorship over time and across cultural areas.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective bibliometric review of all articles published in 2004 and 2014 in three high-ranking general psychiatry journals. Statistical comparisons were made between the two years and with results from a baseline assessment in 1994.

Results:

The overall percentage of female authors increased from 24.6% in 1994 to 33.2% in 2004 to 38.9% in 2014. Though increases in female authorship were statistically significant for both decades, there was less difference between 2004 and 2014, indicating a possible ceiling effect. Rates of female first authors increased between 1994 and 2014, though to a lesser degree between 2004 and 2014. Numbers of female corresponding authors plateaued between 2004 and 2014. Within Europe, Scandinavia displayed the most balanced gender-wise first author ratios. Western European and Central European countries increased their rates of female first authors substantially between 2004 and 2014.

Conclusions:

Despite gains in some areas, our study reveals considerable deficits in the diversity of the current academic psychiatric landscape. Ongoing efforts and interventions to enhance the participation of underrepresented groups on institutional, political and editorial levels are necessary to diversify psychiatric research.

Keywords

Academic psychiatryPsychiatry in Europe
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 44 , July 2017 , pp. 90 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Østergaard, CRTimmermans, BKristinsson, KDoes a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Res Policy 2011; 40: 500–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daley, SWingard, DLReznik, VImproving the retention of underrepresented minority faculty in academic medicine. J Natl Med Assoc 2006;98:1435.Google ScholarPubMed
Riska, EGender and medical careers. Maturitas 2011; 68: 264–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, SJThomas, CR Jr.Desai, SHolliday, EBJagsi, RSchmitt, C, et al.Gender differences in publication productivity, academic rank, and career duration among U.S. academic gastroenterology faculty. Acad Med 2016; 91: 1158–1163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, D The status of higher education teaching personnel in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. International Higher Education and Research Conference 2005Google Scholar
Jolliff, LLeadley, JCoakley, ESloane, RWomen in US academic medicine and science: statistics and benchmarking report 2011–2012 Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2012. p. 1–59.Google Scholar
Amering, MSchrank, BSibitz, IThe gender gap in high-impact psychiatry journals. Acad Med 2011; 86: 946–952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
eHRAF World cutures; 2015, http://www.ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu/ehrafe/regionsCultures.do#region=0.Google Scholar
Corp. I. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2013.Google Scholar
Riecher-Rossler, ASex and gender differences in mental disorders. Lancet Psychiatr 2017; 4(1): 8–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sobanski, TSauer, HBär, KWagner, GGender differences in neural activation during perceptual uncertainty in patients with major depression. Eur Psychiatry 2016;33:S200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agyapong, VJuhas, MRitchie, AKavanagh, AGender differences and characteristics of psychiatric patients assessed in the emergency department of a regional hospital in Canada. Eur Psychiatry 2016;33:S439–S440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, DAKovshilovskaya, BBreyer, BNGender trends of urology manuscript authors in the United States: a 35-year progression. J Urol 2012; 187: 253–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jagsi, RGuancial, EAWorobey, CCHenault, LEChang, YStarr, R, et al.The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature — a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 281–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nkenke, ESeemann, RVairaktaris, ESchaller, HGRohde, MStelzle, F, et al.Gender trends in authorship in oral and maxillofacial surgery literature: a 30-year analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43: 913–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piper, CLScheel, JRLee, CIForman, HPGender trends in radiology authorship: a 35-year analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 206: 3–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sidhu, RRajashekhar, PLavin, VLParry, JAttwood, JHoldcroft, A, et al.The gender imbalance in academic medicine: a study of female authorship in the United Kingdom. J R Soc Med 2009; 102: 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colleges AoAM. The state of women in academic medicine: the Pipeline and pathways to leadership; 2013–2014, https://www.aamc.org/members/gwims/statistics/.Google Scholar
Colleges AoAM Women in U.S. academic medicine statistics and medical school benchmarking; 2008–2009, https://www.aamc.org/members/gwims/statistics/stats09/.Google Scholar
Westring, AFSpeck, RMDupuis Sammel, MScott, PConant, EFTuton, LW, et al.Culture matters: the pivotal role of culture for women's careers in academic medicine. Acad Med 2014; 89: 658–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edmunds, LDOvseiko, PVShepperd, SGreenhalgh, TFrith, PRoberts, NW, et al.Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence. Lancet 2016; 388: 2948–2958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, CGordon, LTravis, EChatterjee, AChaudron, LFivush, B, et al.Striving for gender equity in academic medicine careers: a call to action. Acad Med 2016; 91: 1050–1052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macaluso, BLariviere, VSugimoto, TSugimoto, CRIs science built on the shoulders of women? A study of gender differences in contributorship. Acad Med 2016; 91: 1136–1142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perna, LWSex differences in faculty tenure and promotion: the contribution of family ties. Res Higher Educ 2005; 46: 277–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shollen, SLBland, CJFinstad, DATaylor, ALOrganizational climate and family life: how these factors affect the status of women faculty at one medical school. Acad Med 2009; 84: 87–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raj, ACarr, PLKaplan, SETerrin, NBreeze, JLFreund, KMLongitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic productivity among medical faculty across 24 medical schools in the United States. Acad Med 2016; 91: 1074–1079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckley, LMSanders, KShih, MHampton, CLAttitudes of clinical faculty about career progress, career success and recognition, and commitment to academic medicine. Results of a survey. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 2625–2629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, APBlair, JEKo, MGHayes, SNChang, YHCaubet, SL, et al.Gender distribution of U.S. medical school faculty by academic track type. Acad Med 2014; 89: 312–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, MWomen make progress in academic medicine, but leadership disparities linger. Psychiatr News 2015;50:1.Google Scholar
Gornick, JCMeyers, MKCreating gender egalitarian societies: an agenda for reform. Politics Soc 2008; 36: 313–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gender inequality index. United Nations; 2014, http://www.hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index-gii.Google Scholar
Varkey, PJatoi, AWilliams, AMayer, AKo, MFiles, J, et al.The positive impact of a facilitated peer mentoring program on academic skills of women faculty. BMC Med Educ 2012;12:14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Girod, SFassiotto, MGrewal, DKu, MCSriram, NNosek, BA, et al.Reducing implicit gender leadership bias in academic medicine with an educational intervention. Acad Med 2016; 91: 1143–1150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westring, AMcDonald, JMCarr, PGrisso, JAAn integrated framework for gender equity in academic medicine. Acad Med 2016; 91: 1041–1044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carnes, MDevine, PGBaier Manwell, LByars-Winston, AFine, EFord, CE, et al.The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Acad Med 2015; 90: 221–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helitzer, DLNewbill, SLCardinali, GMorahan, PSChang, SMagrane, DNarratives of participants in national career development programs for women in academic medicine: identifying the opportunities for strategic investment. J Womens Health 2016; 25: 360–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.