Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-28T23:27:02.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

French Validation of the “reading the Mind in the Eyes Test”: Relation with Subclinical Psychotic Positive Symptoms in General Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

R.F. Cohen
Affiliation:
Centre Expert pour les Troubles Bipolaires and Service de Psychiatrie et Psychologie Clinique, CHU de Nancy and Fondation FondaMental, Nancy, France
A. Tubiana-Potiez
Affiliation:
Service de Psychiatrie et Psychologie Clinique, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France
J.P. Kahn
Affiliation:
Centre Expert pour les Troubles Bipolaires and Service de Psychiatrie et Psychologie Clinique, CHU de Nancy and Université de Lorraine and Fondation FondaMental, Nancy, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Few tests are available to assess 'Theory of Mind' (ToM) abilities in adults in French. The objective of this study was to validate a ToM task, the 'Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test' (abbreviated below: 'RMET'1). The ToM belongs to social cognition processes, which have impacts on the everyday functioning of schizophrenic patients (in meta-analysis2) but also in bipolar disorder patients3.

This test assesses the ToM with pictures of 'eye-region of the face', which express a mental state. The test was administered to 142 undergraduate students. The different validities were supported by the analyze of the relations between the RMET and a score at a Facial Emotion Recognition Test (FERT4; convergent validity) and between the former and the 'Mill-Hill vocabulary test' (Mill-Hill; a verbal intelligence test: divergent validity). A regression was computed to determine if the score at the RMET predicts better the life-time subclinical positive psychotic symptoms assessed with the CAPE-42 (CAPE) scale than other abilities.

The correlation between the RMET and the FERT are significant and the RMET did not correlate significantly with the Mill-Hill. The Beta coefficient of the score at the RMET is significant (β = -.27; t = -3.13; p = .002), whereas the FERT and the Mill-Hill Beta coefficients were not significant.

This French version of the RMET shows good convergent and divergent validities. Furthermore, the test shows better predictive value than the FERT and the Mill-Hill. The results demonstrate that the RMET presents sound predictive utility.

Type
Article: 1226
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.