Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:20:19.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Framing the implementation process of a social innovation project for people with severe mental disorders in chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

M. Solis-Soto
Affiliation:
Instituto De Ciencias De La Salud, Universidad de O’Higgins, Rancagua, Chile
G. Reginatto
Affiliation:
Instituto De Ciencias De La Salud, Universidad de O’Higgins, Rancagua, Chile
R. Alvarado
Affiliation:
Instituto De Ciencias De La Salud, Universidad de O’Higgins, Rancagua, Chile
T. Arratia
Affiliation:
Instituto De Ciencias De La Salud, Universidad de O’Higgins, Rancagua, Chile
M. Burrone*
Affiliation:
Instituto De Ciencias De La Salud, Universidad de O’Higgins, Rancagua, Chile
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

There are important challenges for the effective inclusion in society of people with severe mental disorders (SMD). The POTENCIAT intervention supports the formation of work cooperatives for the socio-labour inclusion of people with SMD working together with women in vulnerable situations and older adults.

Objectives

To analyse the implementation process of the first phase of POTENCIAT

Methods

According to Nilsen, six components were analysed: implementation object, implementation activities, implementation actors, users, inner context and outer context. A qualitative study was performed during the first phase of the project (12-months). Participant observation and in-depth interviews with key actors, users and fieldwork team were conducted, as well as bibliographic analysis of field notes, meeting minutes and audios/videos of socialization activities. Ethical issues were considered.

Results

The implementation object was positively valued as a response to perceived needs such as users involvement in a participatory approach. Shared decision-making process was emphasized. Implementation activities were accompanied by local teams and were adapted to participants needs and context characteristics (e.g. social distancing). Most users showed high expectations related to the solidarity economic model as well as physical and economic autonomy, which work as a key factor for commitment and retention in the project. A good working environment was recognized and a space for personal fulfillment. Some barriers were recognized, including cultural stigma, auto-stigma, and recruitment in pandemic context.

Conclusions

Early and proper addressing of factors that may positively and negatively affect the implementation process is mandatory to achieve the effective inclusion of people with SMD.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.