Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T05:51:05.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FC26-03 - Comparison of quality of life and global function in chronic psychiatric patients before and after rehabilitation center in kashan (2009)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

A. Ahmadvand
Affiliation:
Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
Z. Sepehrmanesh
Affiliation:
Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
R. Saei
Affiliation:
Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The concept of quality of life has considerably important in evaluation of efficacy of therapeutic and rehabilitation programs in all medical fields, especially psychiatric disabilities therefore any intervention which cannot improve patient’s quality of life, their effectiveness is doubt. The aim of this study is evaluation of quality of life of chronic mental patients, before and after residence in rehabilitation center.

Methodes

This study is quasi experimental that carried out on all of patients in rehabilitation center in Kashan(Iran). Demographic, Quality of Life and Global Function Scale questionnaires were used at the time of admission and next 6 months. Data were analyzed by paired T-Test and correlation tests.

Results

The mean of function level was at the time of admission 31/47+/−7/5 and after of 6 months 36/52+/−7/15, that this difference was significant (p = 0/0001).

The mean of physical quality of life was 49/28+/−16/01 at the time of admission and after 6 months was 56/64+/−16/99, so the mean of mental quality of life at the time of admission was 37/20+/− 11/10 and after follow up 46/19+/−4/05.the mean of global quality of life was 42/75+/− 10/34 at the time of admission and after 6 months 54/59+/− 12/84, which this difference was significant.(p = 0/0001)

In this study relation between age and quality of life was significant. (p = 0/0001)

Conclusion

Results showed that various factors may have role in this change. Such as type of provided services, quality of treatment, emotional support of staff and family, homogenous group therapy, organized life.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.