Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:49:40.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FC23-06 - Analysis of outpatient care received by over 780,000 statutory health insured individuals diagnosed with depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

R.D. Kocalevent
Affiliation:
Mental Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
S. Bönisch
Affiliation:
Mental Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
R. Mergl
Affiliation:
Mental Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
H. Matschinger
Affiliation:
Mental Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
C. Wimmer-Brunauer
Affiliation:
Kassenärztliche Vereinigung, München, Germany
M. Tauscher
Affiliation:
Kassenärztliche Vereinigung, München, Germany
D. Kramer
Affiliation:
Kassenärztliche Vereinigung, München, Germany
U. Hegerl
Affiliation:
Mental Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
A. Bramesfeld
Affiliation:
Mental Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Former studies show low treatment rates of outpatients with a diagnosis of depression. Various characteristics influence these treatment rates.

Objectives/aims

To examine the effects of individual and regional characteristics on getting depression-specific treatment in the federal state of Bavaria.

Methods

Outpatient treatment for depression as well as individual and regional characteristics of outpatients diagnosed with depression were analyzed based on secondary data from the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians Bavaria in 2006 (N = 780,226). Depression-specific treatment was classified in “Threshold” and “Subthreshold” treatment according to its intensity. Descriptive analyses were followed by logistic regression analysis (STATA, PASW).

Results

More than half of the patients diagnosed with depression did not use any depression-specific treatment within one year. Individual factors which heighten the rates of a depression-specific treatment were female gender, middle age, a moderate or severe depression, a psychiatric comorbidity and no somatic comorbidity. Interestingly, living in a more rural area increased the chance of using “Threshold” treatment.

Conclusions

The knowledge about the influence of individual characteristics on getting a depression-specific treatment is important to reach the risk groups. A possible reason for higher rates of “Threshold” treatment in rural areas is the higher rate of pharmacotherapy in rural areas, which was more often classified as “Threshold” treatment than psychotherapy according to our classification.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.