Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:41:40.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FC21-02 - Mental health and social care collaboration: A Cross-national whole network analysis of organisational partnerships in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

P. Nicaise*
Affiliation:
Institute of Health and Society, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Socially marginalised people with mental health disorders have complex needs that require integrated care. However, mental health and social care sectors are fragmented, and inter-organisational collaboration is challenging.

Aim

A cross-national whole Network Analysis was carried out to detect and interpret patterns of relations between mental health and social care services in several European cities and assess their levels of care integration, following Leutz's levels: linkage, coordination and full integration.

Method

Data on referrals and service routine meetings were collected in deprived areas of 14 European cities and processed within a Social Network Analysis approach. Structural indicators included degrees, components and overlapping cliques, betweenness centrality and centralisation and brokerage roles. Patterns of collaboration were compared across cities.

Results

Few cities had full integrated services. Whole networks had relatively low densities, including denser sub-networks of similar services. The linkage across sectors remained weaker than the linkage within sectors. Services situated in broker positions were not always integrated nor commissioned for care coordination. The centrality of these services was higher when the linkage density was lower.

Conclusions

Although differences between structural patterns of mental health and social care networks mainly depend on national care integration policies, the study revealed structural gaps in the achievement of these patterns, whatever the policy model. This could explain why different systems are basically facing the same problems in service delivery despite these differences. These gaps constitute potential weaknesses in the quality of mental health and social care integration at the system level.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.