Negative symptoms represent a separate dimension of schizophrenia psychopathology, distinct from positive symptoms, disorganization and cognitive impairment. It is increasingly acknowledged that negative symptoms are associated with poor functional outcome and represent an unmet need in schizophrenia treatment. Improvement in definition of their phenomenology, assessment instruments and experimental models are needed in order to improve schizophrenia prognosis.

The presentation will review key aspects of the evolution of negative symptom constructs. In particular, findings concerning phenomenology, clinical assessment, association with functional outcome and brain imaging correlates will be presented.

We searched PubMed for English full-text publications with the keywords

Schizophrenia AND “negative symptoms”/“primary negative symptoms”/“deficit schizophrenia”/“persistent negative symptoms”/“affective flattening”/alogia/“expressive deficit”/apathy/asociality/“social withdrawal”/anhedonia/“anticipatory anhedonia”/avolition/neuroimaging.

The distinction between secondary negative symptoms (i.e., those due to identifiable factors, such as drug effects, psychotic symptoms or depression), and primary or persistent negative symptoms (i.e., those etiologically related to the core pathophysiology of schizophrenia) is grounded on solid research evidence and might have major implications for both treatment development and clinical care. The evidence that negative symptoms cluster in motivation- and expressive-related domains is founded on large consensus and empirical evidence and will foster pathophysiological modeling. The motivation-related domain is a stronger predictor of functional outcome than the expressive one.

An improved definition and assessment of negative symptoms needs to translate in large-scale studies to advance knowledge. In the short-term, the improved identification of treatable causes of secondary negative symptoms can translate into better care for people with schizophrenia.

AM received honoraria or advisory board/consulting fees from the following companies: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka, Pfizer and Pierre Fabre.

SG received honoraria or advisory board/consulting fees from the following companies: Lundbeck, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Hoffman-La Roche, Angelini-Acraf, Otsuka, Pierre Fabre and Gedeon-Richter.