Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T09:45:09.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of compliance with mems in schizophrenic patients and its relationship with clinical and psychopathological variables. Preliminary data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

F. Acosta
Affiliation:
Mental Health Unit, University Insular Hospital of Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
E. Bosch
Affiliation:
Mental Health Unit, University Insular Hospital of Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
G. Sarmiento
Affiliation:
Mental Health Unit, University Insular Hospital of Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
N. Juanes
Affiliation:
Mental Health Unit, University Insular Hospital of Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
A. Caballero
Affiliation:
Research Unit, University Hospital of Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas, Spain
T. Mayans
Affiliation:
Mental Health Unit, University Insular Hospital of Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

Among schizophrenic patients, prevalence of non-compliance is 25-40%, and it is the most important factor for relapse and bad outcome. MEMS provides of a more precise tool for compliance monitoring than other systems.

Aims

1. To evaluate compliance in schizophrenic outpatients and its relationship with clinical and psychopathological variables. 2. To evaluate the degree of agreement between compliance estimated by psychiatrist, family and patients with ‘real’ compliance. 3. To evaluate psychopathological differences between patients treated with oral antipsychotics (APs) and long-acting injectable (LAI) or depot APs.

Methods

Data concerning clinical variables, psychopathology (insight, psychotic, negative and general psychopathology symptoms), and compliance with treatment (information reported by psychiatrist, caregiver and patient) are recorded. In patients treated with LAI/depot APs, reasons for instauration is also recorded. Compliance of oral APs is evaluated through MEMS, with a follow-up period of three months. Statistical analysis will be performed with the appropriate tests (Pearson's correlation coefficient, T-Student tests and ANOVA test).

Results

To date, 106 patients have been recruited. 77 patients are treated with oral APs (with or without LAI/depot APs) and 29 are receiving only LAI/depot APs. The reasons of instauration of treatment with LAI/depot APs was confirmed non-compliance (24 pat.), suspected non-compliance (3 pat.) and ‘posological comfort’ (2 pat.).

Conclusion

To date, few studies have investigated compliance in schizophrenic patients through MEMS. Identification of variables related to non-compliance seems very relevant in order to establish preventive strategies.

Type
Poster Session 1: Schizophrenia and Other Psychosis
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2007
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.