Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:28:54.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ethics of publication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

C. Hoschl*
Affiliation:
Prague Psychiatric Centre and 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ethical concerns are of a growing importance not only in clinical practice and research, but also in publication process. Every presentation of scientific data should content clear statement disclosing any possible conflicts of interests (e.g., relationship of a researcher to pharmaceutical industry). Redundant publication such as publishing the results of the same trial in several journals under different titles is regarded unethical, as well as “salami slicing”, which is in fact step-by-step publication of partial results of a study (e.g., separately results in males and females, young and elderly etc.) just in order to increase publication output. All of co-authors must provide publisher with their written consent to avoid blind authorship. Only person significantly participating in the concept, design, drafting and reviewing of the study is eligible as an author. Others should be properly acknowledged. Fabrication of data, falsification, plagiarism and other frauds still occur in the scientific literature, although they are beyond any ethical limits.

Type
PR02. Presidential Symposium on Ethics in Psychiatry
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2007
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.