The growing rate of depressive disorders causes needs for more effective and more innovative solutions. The modern patients’ challenges make them fail mostly in the treatment compliance. Some reports have described that escitalopram orally disintegrating tablets (ODT) induce faster response and lower dropout rate than oral standard tablets (OST), although both forms have equal bioavailability.

We tried to clarify effectiveness rates between escitalopram ODT and OST treatments in depressive patients.

An open-label, 6-month, randomized, flexible-dose study was conducted for direct comparison of the effects of escitalopram ODT (N16) and OST (N15) on dropout rate and clinical outcomes in patients with major depression.

Outcome measures included Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Drug Attitude Inventory-10 (DAI), Clinical Global Improvement Scale (CGI), and Psychological General Well-Being Scale (PGWB). The tolerability was assessed by the UKU scale. No significant difference was found in HDRS, CGI, PGWB and GAF between the two forms of tablets. No significant difference was found in any tolerability rates. However, dropout rate favored escitalopram ODT group (N5, 31.3%) vs escitalopram OST (N7, 47.0%). DAI-10 outcomes, both in patients’ general attitude and subjective feelings, were significantly improved in ODT group (P = 0.000), comparing with OST.

Escitalopram in its classical form (OST) has become a leader in a group of antidepressants, thanks to safety of use, efficacy and tolerability. In the ODT form, escitalopram can meet additional needs, both clinical and lifestyle. ODT may reduce dropout rate and costs of long-term treatment improving the patients’ compliance.

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.