Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T11:22:52.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The EQ-5D: A useful quality of life measure in borderline personality disorder?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

A.D.I. van Asselt ,
C.D. Dirksen ,
A. Arntz ,
J.H. Giesen-Bloo  and
J.L. Severens
A.D.I. van Asselt*
Affiliation:
Department Of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202AZMaastricht, The Netherlands
C.D. Dirksen
Affiliation:
Department Of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202AZMaastricht, The Netherlands
A. Arntz
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MDMaastricht, The Netherlands
J.H. Giesen-Bloo
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MDMaastricht, The Netherlands
J.L. Severens
Affiliation:
Department Of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202AZMaastricht, The Netherlands Department of Health Organization, Politics and Economics, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MDMaastricht, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. University Hospital Maastricht, Department of KEMTA, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 43 3875587; fax: +31 43 3874419. E-mail address: [email protected] (A. D. I. Van Asselt).
Get access

Abstract

Introduction

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a severe psychiatric disorder and is associated with significant impairment in quality of life. The aim of the present study is to assess the internal and external responsiveness of the EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) in BPD patients.

Patients and Methods

Data from 49 patients included in a multi-center Dutch randomized trial were used. We used both the EQ-5D utility score and the Visual Analogue Scale of the EuroQoL, and the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index-IV (BPDSI-IV). To determine internal responsiveness, we calculated the standardized response mean (SRM). To determine external responsiveness, we calculated Spearman correlations for the change scores, and compared EQ-5D scores for clinically improved vs. non-clinically improved patients as measured with the BPDSI-IV.

Results

Patient scores improved on all instruments during the three years. SRMs for BPDSI-IV were significantly higher than EQ-5D utility. Three-year Spearman correlation between change scores of BPDSI-IV and EQ-5D utility was 0.487, between BPDSI-IV and EQ-VAS it was 0.404, both statistically significant. EQ-5D utility scores for patients who clinically improved were significantly higher than for patients who did not.

Discussion

We conclude that the EQ-5D is fairly responsive in BPD, and, therefore, especially because of its brevity and user-friendliness, can serve as a useful tool in economic evaluations in patients with BPD.

Keywords

Borderline Personality DisorderHealth economicsQuality of life
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 79 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier Masson SAS 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

APA, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 4th ed.Washington, DCAmerican Psychiatric Association 1994Google Scholar
Arntz, A., van den Hoorn, M., Cornelis, J., Verheul, R., van den Bosch, W.M., de Bie, A.J.et al.Reliability and validity of the borderline personality disorder severity index. J Personal Disord 2003;17(1):45–59CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, R., Rabin, R., De Charro, F.The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: a European perspective LondonKluwer Academic Publishers 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazier, J., Tumur, I., Holmes, M., Ferriter, M., Parry, G., Dent-Brown, K.et al.Psychological therapies including dialectical behaviour therapy for borderline personality disorder: a systematic review and preliminary economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2006;10(35):1–117 iii, ix–xiiCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burstrom, K., Johannesson, M., Diderichsen, F.Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res 2001;10(7):621–635CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaton, D.E., Hogg-Johnson, S., Bombardier, C.Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50(1):79–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crosby, R.D., Kolotkin, R.L., Williams, G.R.Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56(5):395–407CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dowie, J.Decision validity should determine whether a generic or condition-specific measure HRQOL measure is used in health care decisions. Health Econ 2002;11:1–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolan, P.Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997;35(11):1095–1108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 1990;16(3):199–208Google Scholar
Gunther, O.H., Roick, C., Angermeyer, M.C., Konig, H.H.The responsiveness of EQ-5D utility scores in patients with depression: a comparison with instruments measuring quality of life, psychopathology and social functioning. J Affect Disord 2008;105(1–3):81–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giesen-Bloo, J., van Dyck, R., Spinhoven, P., van Tilburg, W., Dirksen, C., van Asselt, T.et al.Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: randomized trial of schema-focused therapy vs transference-focused psychotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006;63(6):649–658CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garratt, A.M., Ruta, D.A., Abdalla, M.I., Russell, I.T.SF 36 health survey questionnaire: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions. Qual Health Care 1994;3(4):186–192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husted, J.A., Cook, R.J., Farewell, V.T., Gladman, D.D.Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53(5):459–468CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haywood, K.L., Garratt, A.M., Dziedzic, K., Dawes, P.T.Generic measures of health-related quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis: reliability, validity and responsiveness. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002;41(12):1380–1387CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayhurst, H., Palmer, S., Abbott, R., Johnson, T., Scott, J.Measuring health-related quality of life in bipolar disorder: relationship of the EuroQol (EQ-5D) to condition-specific measures. Qual Life Res 2006;15(7):1271–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, N.S., Truax, P.Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59(1):12–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konig, H.H., Roick, C., Angermeyer, M.C.Validity of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with schizophrenic, schizotypal or delusional disorders. Eur Psychiatry 2007;22(3):177–187CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, N., Johnson, J.A., Shaw, J.W., Feeny, D., Coons, S.J.Self-reported health status of the general adult U.S. population as assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index. Med Care 2005;43(11):1078–1086CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liang, M.H., Fossel, A.H., Larson, M.G.Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990;28(7):632–642CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamers, L.M., Bouwmans, C.A., van Straten, A., Donker, M.C., Hakkaart, L.Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in mental health patients. Health Econ 2006;15(11):1229–1236CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marra, C.A., Woolcott, J.C., Kopec, J.A., Shojania, K., Offer, R., Brazier, J.E.et al.A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med 2005;60(7):1571–1582CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paris, J.The treatment of borderline personality disorder in light of the research on its long-term outcome. Can J Psychiatry 1993;38(Suppl. 1):S28–S34Google ScholarPubMed
Palmer, S., Davidson, K., Tyrer, P., Gumley, A., Tata, P., Norrie, J.et al.The cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder: results from the BOSCOT trial. J Personal Disord 2006;20(5):466–481CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickard, A.S., Johnson, J.A., Feeny, D.H.Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke. Qual Life Res 2005;14(1):207–219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasanen, P., Roine, E., Sintonen, H., Semberg-Konttinen, V., Ryynänen, O.P., Roine, R.et al.Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: a systematic literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2006;22(2):235–241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, D.B., Schenker, N.Multiple imputation in health-care databases: an overview and some applications. Stat Med 1991;10(4):585–598CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuels, J., Eaton, W.W., Bienvenu, O.J.Brown, C.H., Costa, P.T. jr.Nestadt, G.et al.Prevalence and correlates of personality disorders in a community sample. 3rd Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:536–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soeteman, D.I., Verheul, R., van Busschbach, J.J.The burden of disease in personality disorders: diagnosis-specific quality of life. J Personal Disord 2008;22(3):259–268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saarni, S.I., Suvisaari, J., Sintonen, H., Koskinen, S., Härkänen, T., Lönnqvist, J.et al.The health-related quality-of-life impact of chronic conditions varied with age in general population. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60(12):1288–1297CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sapin, C., Fantino, B., Nowicki, M.L., Kind, P.Usefulness of EQ-5D in assessing health status in primary care patients with major depressive disorder. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004;2:20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soeteman, D.I., Timman, R., Trijsburg, R.W., Verheul, R., Busschbach, J.J.et al.Assessment of the burden of disease among inpatients in specialized units that provide psychotherapy. Psychiatr Serv 2005;56(9):1153–1155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stucki, G., Liang, M.H., Fossel, A.H., Katz, J.N.Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48(11):1369–1378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terwee, C.B., Dekker, F.W., Wiersinga, W.M., Prummel, M.F., Bossuyt, P.M.M.On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res 2003;12:349–362CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Asselt, AD, Dirksen, CD, Arntz, A, Giesen-Bloo, JH, van Dyck, R, Spinhoven, P, et al. Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: cost-effectiveness of schema-focused therapy versus transference-focused psychotherapy. Br J Psychiatry, in press.Google Scholar
van de Willige, G., Wiersma, D., Nienhuis, F.J., Jenner, J.A.Changes in quality of life in chronic psychiatric patients: a comparison between EuroQol (EQ-5D) and WHOQoL. Qual Life Res 2005;14(2):441–451CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ware, J.E., Snow, K.K., Kolinski, M., Gandeck, B.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide Boston, MAThe Health Institute, New England Medical Centre 1993Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.