Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:52:23.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-1643 – Gender Incongruence in Adolescents: Diagnostic (in)stability of New Classification Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

M.D.G. Dominguez
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
A. Mayordomo-Aranda
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
E. Cini
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
A. Doig
Affiliation:
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, West London Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
M. Hodes
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

Gender Incongruence (GI) is a rare condition in adolescence characterized by a marked incongruence between one's experienced gender and the assigned sex. It presents as a combination of: a strong discomfort and/or intense rejection of the behavior/attributes of the born gender, a strong desire to live (and be treated) of the experienced gender, and/or a determination to follow the process of transition (i.e. hormonal therapy, sex reassignment surgery). Psychological functioning and treatment outcome has shown significant variation across transgender individuals.

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic stability of GI in adolescents across ICD-10, DSM-IV-TR, DSM-5, and ICD-11.

Methods

Case series of four adolescents aged 16-17 (3 female-born and 1 male-born) with GI seen at Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (London, UK) in 2012, who completed clinical assessments and questionnaires (Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale and Gender identity/GD questionnaire for adolescents and adults).

Results

GI diagnostic criteria varied across diagnostic systems regarding: (1) number of indicators required, (2) symptoms duration, and (3) presence of clinical distress/impairment. In our case series, the latter led to diagnostic instability: two adolescents did not fulfill DMS-IV-TR and DSM-5 criteria. Nonetheless, the dimensional approach supported the GI diagnosis for the four adolescents.

Conclusions

Classification systems evolved in their conceptualization of GI over time evidenced by a shift in the condition name and diagnostic criteria. Diagnostic instability across classification systems may have an impact on their clinical utility. Evidenced-based investigations are required to further assess the clinical utility of the new classification systems.

Type
P04 - Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.