Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:53:40.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-1382 – Idea Inpatient Discharge Project: Experiences and Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

C. Roventa
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Hospital Pr.Dr. Al. Obregia, Bucharest, Romania
O. Zhabenko
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Ukrainian Research Institute of Social and Forensic Psychiatry and Drug Abuse, Kiev, Ukraine
G. Thornicroft
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, King's College London (Institute of Psychiatry, London, United Kingdom
N. Sartorius
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Association for the Improvement of Mental Health Programmes (AMH Association for the Improvement of Mental Health Programmes (AMH), Geneva, Switzerland
I.D.E.A. IDEA Research Group
Affiliation:
IDEA Research Group, IDEA Research Group, IDEA Research Group, United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

IDEA project is the outcome of Association for the Improvement of Mental Health programme and coordinated at Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London.

Aims

Are to explore experience of people treated in a mental health setting across nations, determine how inpatient experiences can be improved. Experience gained from interviews will be used to propose questionnaire for routine use, develop versions of interview for other services, inform a possible follow-up study.

Methods

30 consecutive patients are interviewed on day of discharge in own language. Semi-structured interview covers physical condition in institutions, experiences of treatments like medication, satisfaction with staff, privacy, dignity and whether rights were respected. Responses are summarized on several visual analogue scales and quantitative analysis were performed. The scale was also be analysed by demographic indices within centres to see whether different groups have different experiences.

Qualitative responses were analysed thematically, both within and between centres, identifying core themes for each domain and core themes for the protocol as a whole.

Results

10 countries are participating, 577 interviews are completed. We followed on visual analogue scale the degree patients felt their stay was beneficial, degree of satisfaction with staff, perceived harm in the hospital, if the right to confidentiality was respected, if individual rights and preferences were respected.

Conclusion

It will be a better understanding of the size, structure and staffing of the institutions included in the study, which will help us with our observations about inpatient experiences by putting them in context and make recommendations to institutions.

Type
EPW22 - Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry 2
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.