Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:29:28.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-1159 – Defining Emotions: Exploring Chaos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

T. Scheff*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This essay suggests the need to abandon vernacular terms used for emotions, and a preliminary attempt to define them instead. First described is the massive confusion in popular and scientific conceptions of emotion. Although recently there has been considerable interest, we are still in the flat earth stage. The main problem is a sizeable structure of erroneous assumptions, such as venting anger’gets it off your chest.’ There seem to be at least four defenses against confronting emotions directly: 1. Ignore. 2. Generalize (using only abstract terms: emotions, affect, arousal, etc.). 3. Disguise: use one of the vast number of alternative words that hide emotional content, such as’an awkward moment.’ 4.

Confuse:

especially in English, the most important emotion terms are at least ambiguous and often misleading. A preliminary approach is offered toward defining fear, grief, anger, shame and pride. The elaborate hiding of shame studies by the use of alternative words is described in detail. Approaches to emotion that allow them to be noticed and discussed openly and directly are probably important not only for research but for our whole civilization.

Type
P38 - Others
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.