Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T10:51:48.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-0721 – Measurement of Fidelity in Case Management Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

P. Mateus
Affiliation:
National Programme for Mental Health, Health Directorate General, Lisbon, Portugal
J.M. Caldas de Almeida
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medical Sciences, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
A. Carvalho
Affiliation:
National Programme for Mental Health, Health Directorate General, Lisbon, Portugal
M. Xavier
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medical Sciences, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Implementation research is crucial in the mental health field given that evidenced-based care still lack implementation, even in developed countries. In Portugal, the National Mental Health Plan included actions to change the operational model for mental health teams and a case-management (CM) training program was launched by the Ministry of Health.

Objectives:

This study aims to evaluate the fidelity of a CM programme implementation process, according to the measurement of intervention techniques and resources used by mental health professionals.

Methods:

The study was carried out at public and private mental health services in mainland Portugal. The implementation process started with a CM course (SAMHSA procedures), in which mental health professionals were trained by means of guidelines, demonstrative videos, scenarios and role-playing. Implementation fidelity was assessed by the Illness Management Fidelity Scale (Mueser, 2009).

Results:

Mental health professionals assessment (n=71) showed a 15% good implementation rate and a 43% fair implementation rate, but still not enough implementation in 42%. Mean use of the model resources (e.g. duration and family involvement) was lower when compared with the use of techniques (e.g. goals definition, psychoeducation and relapse prevention).

Conclusions:

Despite the fair global implementation rate of the CM model in the Portuguese mental health services, the rate of good implementation is still low. Implementation science may help to reduce the gap between evidence-based practices and their use in routine care, and thus contribute to improve the fidelity of evidence based care models for patients with severe mental illness.

Type
P11 - Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.