Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:26:06.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Double dissociation of deficits in visuospatial memory and executive function in patients with major depression with and without ECT referral

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

P. Oulis
Affiliation:
1st Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
S. Kalogerakou
Affiliation:
1st Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
V.-M. Papakosta
Affiliation:
1st Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
D. Kontis
Affiliation:
1st Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece 1st Psychiatric Department, Psychiatric Hospital of Attica, ‘Dafni’, Athens, Greece
E. Theochari
Affiliation:
1st Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
M. Koutroumpi
Affiliation:
1st Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
E. Anyfandi
Affiliation:
1st Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
I. Michopoulos
Affiliation:
2nd Department of Psychiatry, Athens University Medical School -Attikon Hospital, Athens, Greece
C. Poulopoulou
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Eginition Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece
E. Tsaltas
Affiliation:
1st Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The pretreatment neuropsychological profile of drug-resistant patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) referred for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) may differ from that of their drug-respondent MDD counterparts. Such differences could help in identifying distinct MDD subtypes, thus offering insights into the neuropathology underlying differential treatment responses.

Method

Depressed patients with ECT referral (ECTs), depressed patients with no ECT referral (NECTs) and nonpsychiatric Controls (matched groups, n = 15) were assessed with memory and executive function tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB).

Results

ECTs scored significantly lower than NECTs in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; p = 0.01). NECTs performed worse than Controls in the Paired Associates Learning (PAL) task (p < 0.03 ; Control/NECT p < 0.01) and the Spatial Recognition Memory (SRM) task (p < 0.05 ; Controls/NECTs p < 0.05) ; ECTs performed between Controls and NECTs, not differing from either. In the Intra/Extradimensional (IED) set-shifting task, ECTs performed worse that Controls and NECTS (IED: p < 0.01 ; Controls/ECTs p < 0.01), particularly in the shift phases, which suggests reduced attentional flexibility. In Stockings of Cambridge (SOC), ECTs abandoned the test early more often than Controls and NECTs (H = 11, p < 0.01) but ECTs who completed SOC performed comparably to the other two groups.

Conclusions

A double dissociation emerged from the comparison of cognitive profiles of ECT and NECT patients. ECTs showed executive deficits, particularly in attentional flexibility, but mild deficits in tests of visuospatial memory. NECTs presented the opposite pattern. This suggests predominantly frontostriatal involvement in ECT versus temporal involvement in NECT dépressives.

Type
P02-550
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.