Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:36:07.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential Impact of Deep Brain Stimulation or Anterior Capsulotomy on General Functioning, Personality Features and Quality of Life in OCD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

L. Gabriels ,
P. Cosyns  and
B. Nuttin
L. Gabriels
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University Hospitals Leuven, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium
P. Cosyns
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium
B. Nuttin
Affiliation:
Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Research on deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) shows promising effects on symptoms severity.

Objectives

To compare outcomes between DBS and bilateral capsulotomy on general functioning, personality traits and quality of life.

Methods

Consecutive patients with severe and treatment refractory OCD underwent DBS in the anterior limb of the internal capsule (DBS; n = 14) or anterior capsulotomy (CAPS; n = 14). They were tested before surgery (baseline-BL) and after a mean follow-up time (FU) of 19 months (range 14-31 months). Changes in OCD severity were recorded and global assessment of functioning, personality traits, and quality of life were compared between groups.

Results

Statistically significant differential improvements (p < 0.05, Bonferroni corrected) were seen in

*General assessment of functioning (Mn ± 95%CI) GAF: DBS_BL:32.9 ± 3.6; DBS_FU:68.6 ± 7.2; CAPS_BL:35.0 ± 2.7; CAPS_FU:56.4 ± 5.9)

*Personality traits on MMPI (T-score Mn ± 95%CI) Scale 2-depression: DBS_BL:83.7 ± 6.5; DBS_FU:61.9 ± 6.3; CAPS_BL:81.2 ± 8.6; CAPS_FU:77.6 ± 8.7 Scale 9-mania: DBS_BL:48.8 ± 7.3; DBS_FU:57.0 ± 4.2; CAPS_BL:53.8 ± 7.5; CAPS_FU:45.6 ± 6.2 Scale 0-social introversion: DBS_BL:66.8 ± 5.2; DBS_FU:56.1 ± 4.1; CAPS_BL:67.7 ± 7.0; CAPS_FU:66.4 ± 5.8)

* Quality of life: Q-LES-Q Endicott (Mn ± 95%CI) overall score (1-5): DBS_BL:1.2 ± 0.3; DBS_FU:3.4 ± 0.6; CAPS_BL:1.5 ± 0.3; CAPS_FU:2.6 ± 0.4 and in the sub domains feelings (%): DBS_BL:36.8 ± 4.2; DBS_FU:68.6 ± 8.8; CAPS_BL:39.1 ± 5.1; CAPS_FU:54.0 ± 5.9 leisure activities (%): DBS_BL:30.6 ± 5.9; DBS_FU:68.5 ± 7.9; CAPS_BL:40.2 ± 5.4; CAPS_FU:58.3 ± 7.1 social relationships (%):DBS_BL:43.9 ± 5.5; DBS_FU:70.2 ± 8.0; CAPS_BL:46.9 ± 6.8; CAPS_FU:60.1 ± 6.9

Conclusion

These findings suggest a superior impact of DBS over capsulotomy on general functioning, personality traits and quality of life. Limits of this study are the small numbers, the fact that DBS and CAPS patients were from a slightly different OCD population and were not randomized to treatment, and differences in postoperative follow-up.

Type
P02-544
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 26 , Issue S2: Abstracts of the 19th European Congress of Psychiatry , March 2011 , pp. 1140
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.