Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:19:47.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Delirium, Hallucinations and Criminal Liability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

M. Turki*
Affiliation:
Hedi Chaker University Hospital, Psychiatry Department, Sfax, Tunisia
N. Halouani
Affiliation:
Hedi Chaker University Hospital, Psychiatry Department, Sfax, Tunisia
R. Naoui
Affiliation:
Hedi Chaker University Hospital, Psychiatry Department, Sfax, Tunisia
I. Gassara
Affiliation:
Hedi Chaker University Hospital, Psychiatry Department, Sfax, Tunisia
N. Hamza
Affiliation:
Hedi Chaker University Hospital, Psychiatry Department, Sfax, Tunisia
J. Aloulou
Affiliation:
Hedi Chaker University Hospital, Psychiatry Department, Sfax, Tunisia
O. Amami
Affiliation:
Hedi Chaker University Hospital, Psychiatry Department, Sfax, Tunisia
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The relationship between psychotic motivation and the genesis of medico-legal acts is well documented in the literature. Delirium and hallucinations, in particular, have been widely reported in this context.

Objective

The aim was to identify socio-demographic, clinical, and criminological profile of patients hospitalized for forensic acts committed in psychotic context.

Methods

We conducted a descriptive retrospective study, including 7 patients committing a forensic act in psychotic context, selected among all patients hospitalized after a judgement of dismissal (Tunisian law), in psychiatry department, Hedi Chaker university hospital, Sfax, Tunisia. Socio-demographic and clinical data were collected through patients’ observations.

Results

The mean age was 37.7 years. Sex-ratio (M/F) was 6. The criminological act was an attack in 57.1% and homicide in 42.9% of cases. It was committed on the outside in 42.9% of cases. The tool was a bladed weapon in all cases. The victim was a family member in 71.4% of cases. The context was a delirium in 71.4% (theme: 80% persecution, 20% jealousy; mechanism: 40% hallucinatory, 60% interpretative) and hallucinations in 42.9% of cases. Among our patients, 57.1% were indifferent and 28.6% regretted the act. Psychiatric diagnosis was: schizophrenia 57.1%; delusional disorder 28.5% and brief psychotic disorder 14.2%. Personality disorder was reported in 28.6% of patients.

Conclusion

The acting out in a psychotic moment in patients with mental illness remains the most formidable event, causing sometimes the problem of criminal liability. Control of attendance at psychotherapy and psychotropic treatment are preventive and curative necessary measures to avoid crossing the dangerous acts.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV705
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.