Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:08:58.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

COVID-19 Psychiatric Inpatient Unit- experience and challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

B. Mesquita*
Affiliation:
Hospital de Cascais, Psychiatry, Alcabideche, Portugal
A. Fraga
Affiliation:
Hospital de Cascais, Psychiatry, Alcabideche, Portugal
M. Albuquerque
Affiliation:
Hospital de Cascais, Psychiatry, Alcabideche, Portugal
P. Espada-Santos
Affiliation:
Hospital de Cascais, Psychiatry, Alcabideche, Portugal
J. Facucho-Oliveira
Affiliation:
Hospital de Cascais, Psychiatry, Alcabideche, Portugal
S. Paulino
Affiliation:
Hospital de Cascais, Psychiatry, Alcabideche, Portugal
M. Costa
Affiliation:
Hospital de Cascais, Psychiatry, Alcabideche, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

On January 2021 the Department of Psychiatry became the only unit exclusively dedicated to COVID patients with severe mental illness in acute decompensation. Only patients in risk of rapid medical deterioration were excluded and forwarded to intensive care.

Objectives

Discussion of this unprecedented experience.

Methods

Analysis of 28 patients hospitalized during 3 months with both an acute psychiatric disorder and an SARS-CoV-2 infection; description of the multidisciplinary intervention made.

Results

Our sample was characterized by a majority of patients with an acute psychotic episode derived from a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (42%) or a bipolar affective disorder (21%). Only 3% of the patients had a diagnosis of severe major depressive disorder. And 10% of patients developed severe respiratory symptoms requiring oxygen or urgent transfer to COVID medical wards. Most patients presented periods of psychomotor agitation, lack of impulse control and self-aggression. Psychopharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions had to be adapted to these unusual conditions. Most of them had already gone through a period of isolation in the buffer ward created to exclude false negatives, which promoted atypical deliriums and symptoms of post-traumatic stress. The psychiatric team was faced with the emergent need to adapt an intervention model based on trust to a model that had to prioritize physical safety.

Conclusions

The pandemic experience was transformative for all who lived through it. From the challenge perspective, it may have been enriching. But the maintained confrontation with the antithesis of therapy, defined by “caring, supporting, communicating, approaching”, was devastating in ways that we consider essential to be debated.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.