No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Countertranference Issues and Its Implications in the Clinics of the Extreme: the Peculiarity of the Penitentiary Clinic.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 April 2020
Abstract
Clinical practice in the prison environment is part of a special epistemological and praxeological clinic generally classified in the field of the clinical of extreme. The last one is itself defined as: «… clinical practice where all the practitioner technic, personal and ethical abilities are simultaneously and extremely requested i.e. with a particular intensity, in a way generally recognized as excessive, in the limit of what is usually tolerable for a human being.
We find necessary to pose a very particular look on the activities of the staffs implied in this clinical practice. Our experiment allows us to think that it is more complex to consider a neutral clinical practice in such situations where our human condition is exposed by a constant tension carried by the distress of the patient in front of us, his potential dangerousness and factors of guiltiness that sometimes are invited in the encounter.
understand how to escape the real or imagined aggressive of the patient, presented as a sex offender, offender, murderer…?
Consider care of patients whose guilty countertransference are moderate and do not impede the clinics.
catharsis
ongoing
It is very important to consider the countertransferencial process in support of the jailed patient. However, it should in no way be confused with compassion for the victim. The countertransference will in this case take into account all the emotions of the patient (shame, guilt …).
- Type
- Article: 1543
- Information
- European Psychiatry , Volume 30 , Issue S1: Abstracts of the 23rd European Congress of Psychiatry , March 2015 , pp. 1
- Copyright
- Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.