Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:45:50.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of psychiatric emergency service admission rates in an italian COVID-19 hospital during lockdown and last year

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

F. Fiori Nastro*
Affiliation:
Department Of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Roma, Italy
A. Mariano
Affiliation:
Department Of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Roma, Italy
R. Santini
Affiliation:
Department Of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Roma, Italy
F. Di Michele
Affiliation:
Department Of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Roma, Italy
F. Bianchi
Affiliation:
Department Of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Roma, Italy
C. Niolu
Affiliation:
Department Of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Roma, Italy
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Italy has been one of the most affected countries by Covid-19 pandemic. Our University General Hospital, Policlinico of “Tor Vergata” (PTV) in Rome, has become a Covid Hub in order to manage the spread of the epidemic. Thus, our Psychiatric Emergency Service (PES)’s access has been partially limited. Direct indicators of PES activity, as admission rates, can be useful for evaluating the psychological impact of Covid epidemic.

Objectives

To assess psychiatric admittance rates to PES of PTV before and during Covid-19 global pandemic.

Methods

Data from our PES register have been obtained and analyzed. We compared all the psychiatric access during the trimester March – May 2019 and 2020. All patients have been characterized according to clinical features.

Results

A marked reduction of the number of patients presenting to PES has been observed (76 patients) in the 57-day period (March 11–May 04, 2020) of lockdown compared to the same period in 2019 (266 patients). The cutback was visible for all diagnostic groups, except for “Borderline Personality Disorder” diagnosis which have slightly increased. On the other hand, hospitalization rates in our psychiatric inpatients unit remained steady.

Conclusions

Although larger study are needed to understand the mental consequences of the lockdown experience, people’s fear of potential infection might explain our results. Interestingly, personality disorder patients represent an exception to it, suggesting the importance of the clinical characteristics of fearless, engagement in dangerous behavior and detachment from reality. These findings might be helpful to improve psychosocial crisis interventions during the pandemic.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.