Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:19:04.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cognitive Emotional Regulation in Remitted Bipolar and Unipolar Patients: a Romanian Sample.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

R. Romosan
Affiliation:
Neuroscience, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania
V.R. Enatescu
Affiliation:
Neuroscience, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania
F. Romosan
Affiliation:
Neuroscience, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania
I. Papava
Affiliation:
Neuroscience, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania
A. Draghici
Affiliation:
Adult Psychiatry, “Eduard Pamfil” Psychiatric Clinic, Timisoara, Romania
L. Dehelean
Affiliation:
Neuroscience, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania
A.C. Bredicean
Affiliation:
Neuroscience, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania
C. Giurgi-Oncu
Affiliation:
Neuroscience, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania
A. Voina
Affiliation:
Adult Psychiatry, “Eduard Pamfil” Psychiatric Clinic, Timisoara, Romania

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Cognitive emotion regulation refers to the way the individual responds to emotionally arousing information.

Objectives

Identifying differences in cognitive emotion regulation of remitted bipolar (after a depressive episode), remitted unipolar patients and a healthy control group.

Methods

This study was conducted in Timisoara, Romania, between 2009 and 2013 and consists of outpatients from the Timisoara Psychiatric Clinic and the Timisoara Mental Health Center, diagnosed with either bipolar disorder (n=27) or recurrent depressive disorder (n=32), according to ICD-10 criteria and a healthy control group (n=70). For assessing cognitive emotional regulation we used the Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), which comprises of five positive and four negative emotional response strategies (subscales).

Results

Statistically significant differences (p<0.001) between the patient groups and the control group were found in the following subscales: 'self-blame”, 'rumination”, 'catastrophizing”, 'blaming others” (negative emotional response strategies – higher mean scores than the control group), 'positive refocusing” and 'putting into perspective” (positive emotional response strategies – lower mean scores than the control group). When comparing the two patient groups, we found statistically significant differences in the following subscales: 'self-blame” (higher mean scores for unipolar subjects), 'blaming others” (higher mean scores for bipolar subjects), 'positive refocusing” (higher mean scores for unipolar subjects) and 'putting into perspective” (higher mean scores for bipolar subjects).

Conclusions

Cognitive emotional regulation strategies used by unipolar and bipolar patients seem to differ significantly and may be an insight to the medium and long-term outcome, thus potentially guiding therapeutic strategies.

Type
Article: 1154
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.