Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:09:46.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A cardinal approach to evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial rehabilitation based on the analytical hierarchy process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

V. Mitikhin ,
T. Solokhina ,
G. Tiumenkova  and
M. Kuzminova
V. Mitikhin*
Affiliation:
FSBSI “Mental Health Research Centre”, Department Of Mental Health Services, Moscow, Russian Federation
T. Solokhina
Affiliation:
FSBSI “Mental Health Research Centre”, Department Of Mental Health Services, Moscow, Russian Federation
G. Tiumenkova
Affiliation:
FSBSI “Mental Health Research Centre”, Department Of Mental Health Services, Moscow, Russian Federation
M. Kuzminova
Affiliation:
FSBSI “Mental Health Research Centre”, Department Of Mental Health Services, Moscow, Russian Federation
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The approach to evaluating the effectiveness of psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR) of mentally ill patients implies a multidimensional, hierarchical consideration of mental pathology with the inclusion of clinical and psychopathological, socio-environmental and personal indicators when setting goals and objectives of PSR

Objectives

Development of algorithms and models for evaluating the effectiveness of PSR taking into account: clinical, socio-demographic, psychological characteristics of the patient and the characteristics of the family environment, as well as factors of psychiatric care.

Methods

Clinical, statistical, algorithms of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) [1].

Results

Numerical estimates of changes (before and after the PSR program) in the main areas of patient’s functioning disorders, such as motivation, cognition, compliance, coping strategies, family, skills, immediate environment, and others, are proposed as particular criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of PSR. Quantitative estimates for particular criteria are obtained on the basis of rank estimates, which are converted into numerical ones based on AHP algorithms [1]. Quantitative integral estimates of the effectiveness of PSR are obtained on the basis of partial estimates, taking into account the weight of the corresponding areas of impaired functioning of patients.

Conclusions

The developed approach opens up prospects for obtaining numerical, partial and integral estimates based on various rank scales, which are of interest from the point of view of forming criteria-indicators (markers) of the effectiveness of psychosocial, rehabilitation, psychoeducational and psychotherapeutic measures. References: 1. Mitikhin, V.G., Solokhina, T.A. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2019; 119(2): 49-54

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Keywords

rehabilitationanalytic hierarchy processeffectivenesspsychosocial
Type
Abstract
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 65 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 30th European Congress of Psychiatry , June 2022 , pp. S753
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.