Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T04:29:00.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brain activity behind the negative and positive emotions: an experimental setting with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

B. Kabella*
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health- Neurology and Neurosurgery
A. Fehér
Affiliation:
2Semmelweis University – Medicine and Health Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
J. Lazáry
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health- Neurology and Neurosurgery
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The fNIRS is an optical brain monitoring technique which uses near-infrared spectroscopy for the purpose of functional neuroimaging. Using fNIRS, brain activity is measured by using near-infrared light to estimate cortical hemodynamic activity which occurs in response to neural activity. In the aspect of psychiatry fNIRS is a tool that can potentially facilitate the clinical diagnostic process and identify stages of psychiatric illnesses by providing objective and quantifiable evidences of brain changes. However, this will require specific cerebral haemodynamic patterns to be validated in larger clinical populations with specific psychiatric disorders.

Objectives

Our team decided to set a fNIRS system to find out the difference in prefrontocortical (PFC) activity pattern between healthy and anhedonic population. This abstract has been created for introduce our first findings about the difference in PFC activity under emotionally positively or negatively coloured stimuli in healthy population.

Methods

We have measured 5 healthy adults, non-anhedonic participants under emotionally different visual and acustic stimuli with the use of NIRX/NIRScout system with the view of our prefronto-temporo-parietal montege.

Fig 1 We devided our experimental tools into 4 individual 20 second long parts:

Passive neutral visual or acustic stimuli for baseline (watching a black dot or scilence)

Passive visual stimuli (watching a single picture)

Active visual stimuli (choosing from photo collage) to detect contrast of cortical background activation

Passive acustic stimuli (listening sounds)

In total, we defined emotionally, two neutral, four positive and four negative stimuli in our experimental setting.

Softwares: We used HOMER3 for analyzing our datas and estimate hemodinamic reponse factor (HRF) using general linear matrix (GLM) regression. We used AtlasViewer for reconstructing HRF image onto the Colin27 digitalised brain model. And we also used SPSS for statictical analysis between stimuli types and HRF means.

Results

Fig 2 Significant HRF differences were measured in the dominant hemisphere dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) between the influence of each emotionally negative and positive stimuli (p<0.001). The level of DLPFC activity was positively influenced by emotionally positive stimuli (p<0.001).

Image:

Image 2:

Image 3:

Conclusions

Fig 3 Our fNIRS experimental system is a suitable tool to measure and model the pattern of prefrontal cortical activity.

Based on the measured hemodynamic values, we detected a significant activity difference in the dominant hemisphere DLPFC during emotionally positive and negative stimuli, the extent of which is positively influenced by emotionally positive stimuli.

The left DLPFC appears to be a promising target for our next studies of anhedonia.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.