No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Bibliometric analysis about the diagnostic criteria used in psychiatry (1980-2005)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2020
Abstract
The present versions of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) is being revised and their update will be published in a close future. In this sense, our purpose was to know the use of diagnostic criteria, in the Psychiatry area, since a bibliometric perspective.
The material studied was selected using databases (EMBASE & MEDLINE) during 1980-2005 period. Those documents that include the descriptors DSM*, ICD*, diagnostic criteria, Psychiat*, drug* were selected. We applied some bibliometric rules as Price´s Law of increasing in scientific literature.
A total of 11916 (DSM), 2019 (ICD), 30 (Chinese Classification of Mental Disorder), 5 (Cuban Glossary of Psychiatry and Latin American Guide for Psychiatry) documents were obtained in Medline database. Our results show nonfulfilment of Price´s Law because production on DSM or ICD does not grow exponential (yDSM=54.576e0.1255x ; rDSM=0.95; yICD=4.2643e0.1616x; rICD=0.93), after linear adjustment (yDSM= 35.381x-50.295; rDSM=0.98; y=7.7221x-34.931; rICD=0.98). Journals of American and European associations with the highest IF were selected from EMBASE database: American Journal of Psychiatry (IF=8.286; PaIDSM=12.39; PaIICD=0.58) and British Journal of Psychiatry (IF=4.956; PaIDSM=5.62; PaIICD=1.88).
During last years, the uses of diagnostic criteria (DSM or ICD) have increased in scientific literature. Nevertheless, documents that use other classifications are rather little.
- Type
- Poster Session 2: Diagnosis and Classification Issues
- Information
- European Psychiatry , Volume 22 , Issue S1: 15th AEP Congress - Abstract book - 15th AEP Congress , March 2007 , pp. S320
- Copyright
- Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2007
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.